Re: [Corelinux-public] Review of Documentation

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

----- Original Message -----

> I think the documentation looks good, although the FAQ has a few
errors:
>
> 1.3 Will the class libraries and frameworks be portability?
>
>  ...portable?
>
> 1.5:
> Free time, the belief in Open Source, Linux, other organizations
belief in
> the same, and sweat.
> ...organizations'...
>
> 5.4.2: How is the documentation created?
> We are juggling between two systems that generate HTML from comments
in the
> source headers. Luckily, the both work off of the same style of
commenting.
>
> <sp> ...they both work off the same style of commenting.
> or :  they both work from the same style of comments.
>
> Jim Koontz
> jrk...@us...
>

I can't blame the flu on these 8-^ (  thanks.

---
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux