|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 2001-02-28 17:12:44
|
Christophe, I understand the ease of use that the Qt parser may offer, but we don't want the dependency. There must be a more "less demanding" straight XML parser framework that won't wed us to Qt or any other gui based framework no? Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 28 February 2001 00:07, you wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday 27 February 2001 19:20, you wrote: >>> >>> do you have a problem with using/installing qt? >> >> Both qt-2.2.3 and qt1x-1.45 are installed on my RedHat 7.0. >> What problem are you having? > > I have no problem :) > it was more like: I use qt for the parser and is it a problem for you to install it ? > qt 2.2.x series is fine > C. > - -- > | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm > | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix > | > | Travailler dur n'a jamais tué personne, mais pourquoi prendre le risque ? > | -- Edgar Bergen > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAjqdFJMACgkQoY+0C9S+FFBFCwCfULH6sUhT9/kNdjZyPxR1BKNJ > vQcAmwUu6WJL3DwQxMf186a4b3Q5Qtks > =GMXr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Corelinux-develop mailing list > Cor...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop > > > |