|
From: Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@MI...> - 2001-02-28 00:48:58
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 27 February 2001 19:20, you wrote: > C., > > How goes it? The RDFS I sent the other day has been changed, but I am > looking for a meetings of the minds on what the fundemental structure > and properties should be. Here is what I have so far * I use a library which parses any xml document * I wrote some stuff to deal with the rdf file and generate the correspon= ding meta class info this way we can see what we want exactly. do you have a problem with using/installing qt? > > Basically, we COULD get away with just a Class with the ability to > describe Properties with a qualifier (e.g. "Parents", > "AssociatedUserClass", etc.). OR we could draw a line in the sand to > reduce the amount of reasoning code and make things like DefiningParent > and DescribingParent part of the property definition in the schema. > > Thoughts? well my ideas was to have quickly a functional parser in order to test id= eas=20 and then we can have a better view of our parser abstraction and waht we = want=20 for the meta class Is it possible to sit at some point, play with the parser and discuss stu= ff? may be this week end ? C. - --=20 | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix | | Its name is Public Opinion. It is held in reverence. It settles every= thing. | Some think it is the voice of God. | -- Mark Twain -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqcSr8ACgkQoY+0C9S+FFCASQCeLTMZfQ+ZNQ+/8Wbs9rIxzYcY h3MAoIKhnMDf4EyuWsws7sD1cWjI+0hr =3Dr9Xi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |