Re: [Corelinux-develop] Thought, parser, template

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Hans,

Sometimes I just close them without updating the compete %. Filter on
only "open" ones.

But there are still open "feature/defects" in Bug Tracker if you want to
take any of those out, like:

Coming up with a per Thread Signal Mask management thingy. That, in my
mind, would complete the Thread work.

Another one is, maybe, seeing if there are thread patterns worth
developing, or thread pools.

If that doesn't interest you, how about:

Analysis/Design/Implementation of a framework similar to Java's JNDI?

Hans Dulimarta wrote:
> 
> "Frank V. Castellucci" wrote:
> >
> > Hans - Dulimarta wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Frank V. Castellucci wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Task ID 11325: libcl++ implementation of Factory Method Pattern (Req 5097)
> >
> > hmmmm, that has been implemented as AbstractAllocator in AbstractFactory
> > <grin>.
> > You may want to review it as I may have not done a good job on it,
> > but...
> >
> 
> I just use the Task Manager facility on SourceForge and found the above
> task is
> unassigned and 0% complete. Probably this is not up to date.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Corelinux-develop mailing list
> Cor...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
http://PythPat.sourceforge.net
Pythons Pattern Package