Re: [Corelinux-develop] Persistent thoughts

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> 
> Another 2 cents:)
> 
> should the data be human readable ?

I believe that is the question to the person who writes the concrete
persistent implementation classes.

> That is, is it of interest to be able to edit "by hand" the "state" of an
> object ?

Again, is that our concern in the abstraction?

> is it a concern for the framework or for the user of the framework ?

Well, it is not of concern for the CoreLinux++ group as long as we don't
BREAK the ability to do what the implementation needs to do.

> 
> Otherwise it appears to me that a structured/hierarchical way of storing data
> would be best for the persistence framework.
> 
> C.
> --
>  Christophe Prud'homme                | Pierre: Je suis désolé Thérèse, je ne
>  MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243          |         sais pas ce qui m'a pris...
>  Cambridge MA 02139                   |         c'est une catastrophe.
>  Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229 | Thérèse: Ce n'est rien Pierre,
>  Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559 |          je n'ai rien senti....
>  http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm   | -- Le Pere Noel est une ordure
>                           Following the hacker spirit
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Corelinux-develop mailing list
> Cor...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
http://PythPat.sourceforge.net
Pythons Pattern Package