Re: [Corelinux-develop] Missing mail retry

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Thomas Matelich wrote:

> "Frank V. Castellucci" wrote:
>
> > CoreLinux++ is not A framework, but many. It is not our intent to tightly couple each
> > framework to each other, our disciplines will ensure that. In the event it is
> > natural, for say the Persistence framework to use some kind of library loading
> > capability, then we of course we use the abstraction of the Library Load framework.
> > But it would be up to the solution space to instantiate the appropriate derivation.
> >
> > By the same token, our frameworks are to be "plug-in-able", if the user selects a
> > persistence framework implementation that doesn't require other frameworks, that is
> > fine as well.
>
> Great, now I have to quit complaining :)  So my question then is why Core*Linux*?  Is
> this merely a dependency/complexity management issue?  That is a very good issue.  I
> guess I could start working on CoreWindows++ and CoreHPUX++, or maybe CoreLinux++*3, if
> I wanted to use it.

Because the multi-thread execution profile uses "clone" versus LinuxThreads, and the idea
of the library was specifically targeted to a Linux environment.

>
>
> --
> Thomas O Matelich
> Senior Software Designer
> Zetec, Inc.
> sos...@us...
> tma...@ze...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Corelinux-develop mailing list
> Cor...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/corelinux-develop