Re: [Corelinux-develop] Missing mail retry

[Thomas M. <tma...@ze...>]

"Frank V. Castellucci" wrote:

> CoreLinux++ is not A framework, but many. It is not our intent to tightly couple each
> framework to each other, our disciplines will ensure that. In the event it is
> natural, for say the Persistence framework to use some kind of library loading
> capability, then we of course we use the abstraction of the Library Load framework.
> But it would be up to the solution space to instantiate the appropriate derivation.
>
> By the same token, our frameworks are to be "plug-in-able", if the user selects a
> persistence framework implementation that doesn't require other frameworks, that is
> fine as well.

Great, now I have to quit complaining :)  So my question then is why Core*Linux*?  Is
this merely a dependency/complexity management issue?  That is a very good issue.  I
guess I could start working on CoreWindows++ and CoreHPUX++, or maybe CoreLinux++*3, if
I wanted to use it.

--
Thomas O Matelich
Senior Software Designer
Zetec, Inc.
sos...@us...
tma...@ze...