Re: [Corelinux-develop] Missing mail retry

[Thomas M. <tma...@ze...>]

"Frank V. Castellucci" wrote:

> My post of asking Tom what "scared" him about the framework design
> something I thought he saw in the framework. While we are all concerned
> with providing libraries that are "useable", I have had no compunction
> about adding something complex to enhance the solution space options.
> This may be my background of big systems work, where lots of things are
> thought about. The biggest difference between SOMELib and CoreLinux++ is
> that your library addresses a specific need (and will do it well it
> appears), while CoreLinux++ is after a broad range of uses.

My biggest problem with projects like CoreLinux++ is when they become all or
nothing.  While it is a pain to rely on 12 different projects, being able to pick
your functionality from the best place is great.  If the library loader relies on
the persistence framework which relies on the property accessing methods which
rely on the enhanced RTTI methodology, that is when I say nevermind.  If this is
not true in CoreLinux++, hooray.  Just my opinion.

--
Thomas O Matelich
Senior Software Designer
Zetec, Inc.
sos...@us...
tma...@ze...