|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 2000-09-23 21:01:14
|
Ok, When I set configure.in to 2:0:1, it results in *.so.1.1.0 ? When I set configure.in to 2:1:1, it results in *.so.1.1.0 ? When I set configure.in to 2:1:0, it results in *.so.1.1.0 ? When I set configure.in to 1:2:1, it results in *.so.1.1.0 ? So <grin>, I left it at 2:0:1 and have checked it in. I have also had to retag, which is now rel-0-4-28a and I am ready when you are. Frank Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, you wrote: > > Ok, > > > > I'm confused about your libtool versioning message, and when I make rpm > > sure enough it is not what I expected (it creates libcl++.so.0.1.0) > > where I was looking for either 1.0.1. > I was thinking about that too > > > > > So, as I read libtool (info libtool) I am now under the impression I > > should have done 2:0:1. Is this correct? Either way we must once again > > update configure.in, which means a rebuild. > yes seems so > > > > > If this is becoming too much for you to do, say something. I will go > > with just the rpm stuff I can get done here and don't feel any worse > > about it. > no that's ok I got some delay for my important stuff > so I have no problem with that > > > > > Did you see the developer ratings on SF? Someone doesn't like me :) > no I will look and vote for you :) > > C. > -- > Christophe Prud'homme | > MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243 | Un prud'homme était un homme > Cambridge MA 02139 | d'honneur et de valeur, > Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229 | sage et loyal. > Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559 | -- Chateaubriand > http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm | > Following the hacker spirit |