Re: [Corelinux-develop] conclusions of the previous g++ related threads

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> 
> > I would like to continue this discussion. But, in the short term I have
> > no problem releasing a 0.0.0 of clfw with just the Library Load
> > abstraction, and quickly whack a FunctionLibrary together without the
> > benefit of a more intelligent framework.
> 
> Ok we can release something like corelinux bug fixes/updates
> and a clfw preview technology release

Ok, for the short term I am happy with a tarball release of clfw. I
really would like to learn the rpm spec stuff and will never do so until
you let me :)

> A short note on my disponibilities, I would not mind begin working on clfw,
> unfortunately I am very busy until beginning of october. and then I will be
> able to work at full power for corelinux :). I can only do quick things so
> that my projects integrate well with corelinux.

You have contributed more than you ever will realize I suppose, and I am
certainly not anxious about anything. Decisions like the Class class
thing are not easy ones to make. Class libraries are by far and away one
of the more difficult things to produce because you need to anticipate
large use-case scenarios. Without collaboration, it is almost
impossible.

> 
> --
>      Christophe Prud'homme                    |
>      MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243              |
>      Cambridge MA 02139                       |     Friends are relatives
>      Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229     |     you make for yourself.
>      Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559     |
>      http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm       |
>                           Following the hacker spirit
> _______________________________________________
> Corelinux-develop mailing list
> Cor...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/corelinux-develop

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
http://PythPat.sourceforge.net
Pythons Pattern Package