Re: [Corelinux-develop] Frameworks

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> 
> > the clfw should really be limited to abstract framework bases. In
> > otherwords, the FunctionLibrary loader implementation is a separate
> > deliverable that requires libclfrmwrk and libcorelinux.
> >
> > That way the user has the ability, in the long term, in substituting
> > which FunctionLibrary framework that they want to use. Or they can
> > create their own.
> >
> > I didn't want to force frameworks down anyones throat and this seemed
> > the most flexible. Thoughts?
> so you want to move it again ?

No, I don't want to move clfw or any of the abstractions (Library Load,
Persist, etc.) that will go with it.

When I create the FunctionLibraryLoad implementation, though, it should
be as separate as clfw is to corelinux.

> provide it as an example ?
> 
> --
>    Christophe Prud'homme                  |
>    MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243            |   Un prud'homme était un homme
>    Cambridge MA 02139                     |   d'honneur et de valeur,
>    Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229   |   sage et loyal.
>    Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559   |   -- Chateaubriand
>    http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm     |
>                           Following the hacker spirit
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Corelinux-develop mailing list
> Cor...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/corelinux-develop

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
http://PythPat.sourceforge.net
Pythons Pattern Package