Re: [Corelinux-develop] Frameworks

[Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@MI...>]

> the clfw should really be limited to abstract framework bases. In
> otherwords, the FunctionLibrary loader implementation is a separate
> deliverable that requires libclfrmwrk and libcorelinux.
>
> That way the user has the ability, in the long term, in substituting
> which FunctionLibrary framework that they want to use. Or they can
> create their own.
>
> I didn't want to force frameworks down anyones throat and this seemed
> the most flexible. Thoughts?
so you want to move it again ?
provide it as an example ?

-- 
   Christophe Prud'homme                  |
   MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243            |   Un prud'homme était un homme
   Cambridge MA 02139                     |   d'honneur et de valeur,
   Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229   |   sage et loyal.
   Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559   |   -- Chateaubriand
   http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm     |
                          Following the hacker spirit