Re: [Corelinux-develop] comment on corelinux macros

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> 
> > There is no logic to the order in the macro, other than they are
> > consistent between themselves (name,type, ...).
> >
> > so I take it you are suggesting (type, name,...) to be more like the
> > DECLARE_TYPE.
> 
> yes actually being consistent with the underlying naming/typedefing is good
> so that it is easy to remember.
> 
> I say this as a user that's all
> 
> > If you feel it is right (and I think both you and Hans do, and I do as
> > well), go for it. It won't be the last time some legacy stuff I threw in
> > there will come back to haunt us. :)
> I'll do that
> That's a huge job for the examples, I'll try to automate it :)

sed and awk together?

Hey, do you guys have write access to clfw? They did not respond to the
service request yet but it may have been fixed.


-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
http://PythPat.sourceforge.net
Pythons Pattern Package