Re: [Corelinux-develop] comment on corelinux macros

[Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@us...>]

> There is no logic to the order in the macro, other than they are
> consistent between themselves (name,type, ...).
>
> so I take it you are suggesting (type, name,...) to be more like the
> DECLARE_TYPE.

yes actually being consistent with the underlying naming/typedefing is good
so that it is easy to remember.

I say this as a user that's all

> If you feel it is right (and I think both you and Hans do, and I do as
> well), go for it. It won't be the last time some legacy stuff I threw in
> there will come back to haunt us. :)
I'll do that
That's a huge job for the examples, I'll try to automate it :)

-- 
Christophe Prud'homme 
OOA and OOD for Linux
CoreLinux -- http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
Finite Element Method Codes
KFem      -- http://kfem.sourceforge.net