Re: [Corelinux-develop] Re: Symbol in UML diagrams

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Hans,

Did you get my direct e-mail as to the location and setup of the tool?

PS: Christophe, I think you know where to go to get the same, oui?

Hans Dulimarta wrote:
> 
> "Frank V. Castellucci" wrote:
> >
> > Hans Dulimarta wrote:
> > >
> > > "Frank V. Castellucci" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Which diagrams and header files are you talking about?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Interface implentation has 'const', diagram does not have
> > > '@'
> > >    AbstractSemaphore::getGroupId
> > >    Synchronized::access
> > >
> > > My references are  htdoc/doc/design/*.png and
> > > corelinux/corelinux/*.hpp.
> > >
> > > I know the CVS tree has 'models' module but I do not have
> > > MagicDraw
> > > to open the files.
> >
> > Oops, ok I forget to tell you, my apologies.
> >
> > We have a six license contribution of MagicDrawUML, would you like a
> > copy?
> >
> 
> Yes, please. Are the model files more up-to-date than the *.png files?
> Should I refer to the model files as the base documents for
> implementation?
> 
> > Here is the thing, the newest version is 3.6 which has the ability to
> > store data in XML/XMI (which I was waiting for a very long time), but
> > the current models are in 3.51 (which 3.6 can read). I just want to make
> > sure that 3.6 can save 3.51 without corrupting the data.
> >
> 
> I assume that files within the 'models' module were generated using
> 3.51?
> > >
> > > > Hans Dulimarta wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- "Frank V. Castellucci" <fr...@co...>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Of course, those marked as const member functions in
> > > > > > the diagram but not
> > > > > > declared as such in the header files being?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Being what? I don't understand your answer.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hans Dulimarta wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I found a "non-standard" symbol in the UML class
> > > > > diagrams in
> > > > > > > the .PNG files.
> > > > > > > What is the meaning of "@" symbol? I thought it
> > > > > was used to
> > > > > > > denote "const member function", but then when I
> > > > > compared
> > > > > > > with other files, that's not the case. The class
> > > > > diagram
> > > > > > > shows the '@' symbol but the header file does
> > > > > not have the
> > > > > > > "const" attribute in the member function.
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> > --
> > Frank V. Castellucci
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Corelinux-develop mailing list
> > Cor...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/corelinux-develop
> 
> --
> Hans Dulimarta, Ph.D.                            dul...@co...
> Vis. Research Assoc.                  http://www.egr.msu.edu/~dulimart
> Ph: 517-432-7589  Fax: 760-281-7691   http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
> Elec. & Comp. Engg., Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Corelinux-develop mailing list
> Cor...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/corelinux-develop

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
http://PythPat.sourceforge.net
Pythons Pattern Package