Re: [Corelinux-develop] rpm bugs

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Frank" == Frank V Castellucci <fr...@co...> writes:
> 
>     Frank> Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
>     >>
>     >> 1- the documentation missing files
>     >>
>     >> did you check in /usr/doc/libcorelinux-doc-0.4.26/ps /usr/doc/libcorelinux-doc-0.4.26/pdf
> 
>     Frank> They were empty. The actual build files were in the /latex directory but never made it to
>     Frank> gzip or rpm. I will run again and pipe output to file.
> I will investigate also
ok

> 
>     >> 2- cleanup
>     >>
>     >> I just added the rule it was commented sorry
> 
>     Frank> Checked in?
> Not yet
cool
> 
>     >> 3- shared library links
>     >>
>     >> corrected I included only libcl++.so.* and not libcl++.so* that's why it wasn't there
> 
>     Frank> Why? Don't -lcl look for libcl++.so ?
> at some point there is a rule saying what of kind files you want in certain location
> and I put this . between so and * therefore libcl++.so was not included
> now it is fixed
your a GOD!
> 
>     Frank> I'm saving up for a MP zeon machine.
> what is that ?
> zeon == xeon ?
heh, heh, yes Xeon

> if so we have a xeon here and I found that the xeon are much ado about nothing
> It is more expensive and the gain is not so clear

No, I have done benchmarks with UP and SMP with PIII and Xeon, with the
kind of workloads I have (lots of ephemeral (in memory) stuff) it has
about 25-40% improvement in throughput.

Frank