|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 2000-07-20 21:14:26
|
Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > Frank> Great reference, but without the frameworks I fear the core is not enough to compare yet. > Frank> This, obviously, is the goal of CoreLinux++ and as such Mr. Iguaza would benefit from > Frank> knowing this, although I am suprised that he doesn't consider RPC and CORBA to be the > Frank> bedrock of object/component reuse enabled? > Actually Gnome is using CORBA(through the bonobo component set) but CORBA is not a set > of components, you have to write it by yourself. It seems that he has a bad time(with > his company helixcode http://www.helixcode.com) developping gnome and the set of components > (they are mainly using C as the main language) and that's why he is angry at unix/linux. > I read the article. He has a point, but is shortsighted. If you would like we can discuss distributed framework components that realize both business processing models and business processing rules, vs. the application rules. But there is a tremendous amount of work being done on UNIX/LINUX towards achieving these goals. check out http://www.semanticweb.org , this is the kind of work I am involved with on a day to day basis. frank |