Menu
▾
▴
[Corelinux-develop] Re: [Bug #109336] Inconsistent examples in C++ coding standard
|
From: Hans - D. <dul...@eg...> - 2000-07-12 13:51:06
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000 no...@so... wrote:
> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 05:11:26 -0700
> From: no...@so...
> To: dul...@eg..., dul...@eg...
> Subject: [Bug #109336] Inconsistent examples in C++ coding standard
>
> Bug #109336, was updated on 2000-Jul-12 01:30
> Here is a current snapshot of the bug.
>
> Project: CoreLinux++
> Category: Documentation
> Status: Open
> Resolution: None
> Bug Group: Defects
> Priority: 5
> Summary: Inconsistent examples in C++ coding standard
>
> Details: Some examples code given in the Standards & Guidelines
> are inconsistent with the standards/guidelines.
>
> Follow-Ups:
>
> Date: 2000-Jul-12 08:11
> By: frankc
>
> Comment: I have re-opened this because on my machine it stops and
> prompts me with a question mark and a error reporting:
>
> ! Argument of \@fifhoffive has an extra }.
> <inserted text>
> \par
> 1.1913 ...g the Section~\wref{sec:Class-Functions}
> ?
>
This is the same error message that I got when generating the PDF output
mentioned in my Jul 10 e-mail. I tried both \ref and \vref and got the
same message. [Perhaps, I mistyped the \vref as \wref when switching back
from \ref to \vref].
I "fixed" it by commenting the inclusion of the hyperref package.
Since you said it worked OK on your machine, I uncommented the lines
and did cvs commit. I'll fix it later today.
> At which point I hit enter. As this needs to run automatically
> unattended there may be no-one there to hear the tree fall in the
> forest! ;->
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> For detailed info, follow this link:
> http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=109336&group_id=308
>
--
Hans Dulimarta, Ph.D. dulimart@[egr.msu.edu, computer.org]
Visiting Research Associate http://www.egr.msu.edu/%7edulimart
Ph: (517)432-7589 Fax2Email: (760)281-7691
Elec. & Comp. Engg., Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
|
