"Frank V. Castellucci" wrote:
> I made the changes I spoke of.
>
> I noticed something as well, in reading the process document I saw that
> all Requirements will be discussed for acceptance while I am merrily
> adding the Pattern requirements as though they are approved. I think
> they are squarley in the target of the CoreLinux++ goals but...let me
> know any objections.
>
> Of the current requirements, listed in the Forum, I DON'T think we have
> implicit approval for:
>
> Persistence
> Java Proxy and JVM Interface
> Meta Class
> Directory and Names
> Smart Pointers
> Herbrand Domains
> Class Context
>
> only because we all might not have an understanding as to "What they
> mean" and "Why do we want them".
>
> Happy Holidays
>
> --
> Frank V. Castellucci
>
> _______________________________________________
> Corelinux-public mailing list
> Cor...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/corelinux-public
I had noticed that there were several requirements in the forum, but
I thought that those had been approved before my participation in the
project. I'll look at them more closely. I am sure that they are all
reasonable requirements, and I am also sure that I may not understand all
of them.
JimKoontz
jrk...@us...
|
