corelinux-develop

[Corelinux-develop] release?

[Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@mi...>]

tomorrow I can give some time for the release :)!
shall we do that or wait some time to test the 0.4.27?

C.
-- 
  Christophe Prud'homme                 |  A classic is something that
  MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243           |  everyone wants to have read and
  Cambridge MA 02139                    |  nobody wants to read.
  Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229  |  -- Mark Twain,
  Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559  |  "The Disappearance of Literature"
  http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm    |
                          Following the hacker spirit

Re: [Corelinux-develop] release?

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> 
> tomorrow I can give some time for the release :)!
> shall we do that or wait some time to test the 0.4.27?
> 
> C.
> --

Well, I am going through some testing now (rpm build, install, clfw rpm
build, install, etc.).

There are a few things that would need to be done, which I mark as
optional or required for 0.4.27

1. Hans EventSemaphore (optional)
2. Updated Developers Docs (required)
3. Updated README , ChangeLog (required)
4. Updated web pages (required)

For clfw, there really is no documentation other than the reference
pages in clfw-doc, which may be ok for the time being as long as I
reference the requirement and design models on the web.

Thoughts?

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci

Re: [Corelinux-develop] release?

[Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@mi...>]

> 2. Updated Developers Docs (required)
I can work on that since I made the changes
and it is a good exercise :)

> 3. Updated README , ChangeLog (required)
> 4. Updated web pages (required)

-in the dl page just change the version number at the top of the php file
- add a clfw section in the dl page
I can do that


>
> For clfw, there really is no documentation other than the reference
> pages in clfw-doc, which may be ok for the time being as long as I
> reference the requirement and design models on the web.
>
> Thoughts?
I think so too 
there is still this old adage: << use the code, luc! use the code! >>:)
since it is a tech preview and that should be fine

I go back home now
see ya tomorrow

C.

-- 
 Christophe Prud'homme                |
 MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243          |  C'est de la buche?
 Cambridge MA 02139                   |  Non c'est kloug!
 Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229 |  C'est colmatté avec du schpountz...
 Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559 |  -- Le Pere Noel est une ordure
 http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm   |
                          Following the hacker spirit

Re: [Corelinux-develop] release?

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> 
> > 2. Updated Developers Docs (required)
> I can work on that since I made the changes
> and it is a good exercise :)
> 
> > 3. Updated README , ChangeLog (required)
> > 4. Updated web pages (required)
> 
> -in the dl page just change the version number at the top of the php file
> - add a clfw section in the dl page
> I can do that
> 
> >
> > For clfw, there really is no documentation other than the reference
> > pages in clfw-doc, which may be ok for the time being as long as I
> > reference the requirement and design models on the web.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> I think so too
> there is still this old adage: << use the code, luc! use the code! >>:)
> since it is a tech preview and that should be fine
> 
> I go back home now
> see ya tomorrow
> 
> C.
> 

It seems that the doc-*.rpm is broken again. It doesn't include the PDF
or the PS (although the directories are there), and it now includes the
examples html. Did you change the cfg for doxygen or the spec file
somehow?

If you do not respond I will take a look, if I can't figure I will post
a defect with your name on it :)

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
http://PythPat.sourceforge.net
Pythons Pattern Package

Re: [Corelinux-develop] release?

[Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@MI...>]

> It seems that the doc-*.rpm is broken again. It doesn't include the PDF
> or the PS (although the directories are there), and it now includes the
> examples html. Did you change the cfg for doxygen or the spec file
> somehow?
>
> If you do not respond I will take a look, if I can't figure I will post
> a defect with your name on it :)
Strange everything is fine so far with debian
I'll check that

the huge changes you mentionned are not so huge, I just used the doxywizard 
provided by doxygen
I just added the examples and the CORELINUX macros to the preprocessing system


C.
-- 
    Christophe Prud'homme                   |    So so is good, very good,
    MIT, 77, Mass Ave, Rm 3-243             |    very excellent good:
    Cambridge MA 02139                      |    and yet it is not;
    Tel (Office) : (00 1) (617) 253 0229    |    it is but so so.
    Fax (Office) : (00 1) (617) 258 8559    |    -- William Shakespeare,
    http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm      |    "As You Like It"
                          Following the hacker spirit

Re: [Corelinux-develop] release?

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> 
> > It seems that the doc-*.rpm is broken again. It doesn't include the PDF
> > or the PS (although the directories are there), and it now includes the
> > examples html. Did you change the cfg for doxygen or the spec file
> > somehow?
> >
> > If you do not respond I will take a look, if I can't figure I will post
> > a defect with your name on it :)
> Strange everything is fine so far with debian
> I'll check that
> 
> the huge changes you mentionned are not so huge, I just used the doxywizard
> provided by doxygen
> I just added the examples and the CORELINUX macros to the preprocessing system
> 
> C.
> --

You are right, they were not so huge, but when you first do a diff the
number, not the semantics, of change are what you are first presented
with. Sorry :)

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci
http://corelinux.sourceforge.net
OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
http://PythPat.sourceforge.net
Pythons Pattern Package