|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 2001-02-28 00:13:35
|
C., How goes it? The RDFS I sent the other day has been changed, but I am looking for a meetings of the minds on what the fundemental structure and properties should be. Basically, we COULD get away with just a Class with the ability to describe Properties with a qualifier (e.g. "Parents", "AssociatedUserClass", etc.). OR we could draw a line in the sand to reduce the amount of reasoning code and make things like DefiningParent and DescribingParent part of the property definition in the schema. Thoughts? -- Frank V. Castellucci http://corelinux.sourceforge.net OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux http://PythPat.sourceforge.net Pythons Pattern Package |
|
From: Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@MI...> - 2001-02-28 00:48:58
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 27 February 2001 19:20, you wrote: > C., > > How goes it? The RDFS I sent the other day has been changed, but I am > looking for a meetings of the minds on what the fundemental structure > and properties should be. Here is what I have so far * I use a library which parses any xml document * I wrote some stuff to deal with the rdf file and generate the correspon= ding meta class info this way we can see what we want exactly. do you have a problem with using/installing qt? > > Basically, we COULD get away with just a Class with the ability to > describe Properties with a qualifier (e.g. "Parents", > "AssociatedUserClass", etc.). OR we could draw a line in the sand to > reduce the amount of reasoning code and make things like DefiningParent > and DescribingParent part of the property definition in the schema. > > Thoughts? well my ideas was to have quickly a functional parser in order to test id= eas=20 and then we can have a better view of our parser abstraction and waht we = want=20 for the meta class Is it possible to sit at some point, play with the parser and discuss stu= ff? may be this week end ? C. - --=20 | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix | | Its name is Public Opinion. It is held in reverence. It settles every= thing. | Some think it is the voice of God. | -- Mark Twain -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqcSr8ACgkQoY+0C9S+FFCASQCeLTMZfQ+ZNQ+/8Wbs9rIxzYcY h3MAoIKhnMDf4EyuWsws7sD1cWjI+0hr =3Dr9Xi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 2001-02-28 05:02:07
|
This weekend sounds good, as I said I am out of work for the week and if you want to float something by me sooner feel free. I have Qt installed, I think 1.44 (sound right?) Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tuesday 27 February 2001 19:20, you wrote: > > C., > > > > How goes it? The RDFS I sent the other day has been changed, but I am > > looking for a meetings of the minds on what the fundemental structure > > and properties should be. > Here is what I have so far > * I use a library which parses any xml document > * I wrote some stuff to deal with the rdf file and generate the corresponding meta class info > this way we can see what we want exactly. > > do you have a problem with using/installing qt? > > > > Basically, we COULD get away with just a Class with the ability to > > describe Properties with a qualifier (e.g. "Parents", > > "AssociatedUserClass", etc.). OR we could draw a line in the sand to > > reduce the amount of reasoning code and make things like DefiningParent > > and DescribingParent part of the property definition in the schema. > > > > Thoughts? > well my ideas was to have quickly a functional parser in order to test ideas > and then we can have a better view of our parser abstraction and waht we want > for the meta class > > Is it possible to sit at some point, play with the parser and discuss stuff? > may be this week end ? > > C. > - -- > | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm > | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix > | > | Its name is Public Opinion. It is held in reverence. It settles everything. > | Some think it is the voice of God. > | -- Mark Twain > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAjqcSr8ACgkQoY+0C9S+FFCASQCeLTMZfQ+ZNQ+/8Wbs9rIxzYcY > h3MAoIKhnMDf4EyuWsws7sD1cWjI+0hr > =r9Xi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Corelinux-develop mailing list > Cor...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop -- Frank V. Castellucci http://corelinux.sourceforge.net OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux http://PythPat.sourceforge.net Pythons Pattern Package |
|
From: Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@MI...> - 2001-02-28 15:06:51
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 28 February 2001 00:09, you wrote: > This weekend sounds good, as I said I am out of work for the week and i= f > you want to float something by me sooner feel free. > > I have Qt installed, I think 1.44 (sound right?) Nope 2.2.x series since xml supports was not there in 1.44 C. - --=20 | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix | | Stay away from flying saucers today. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqdFFcACgkQoY+0C9S+FFBAIQCbB6lDNBGsOUDdPS1Ax5a5tjTx i+4An2C2vaMq6O0X13W7oBxR0uQs+2sp =3D2D+w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Hans - D. <dul...@eg...> - 2001-02-28 05:06:30
|
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > On Tuesday 27 February 2001 19:20, you wrote: > > do you have a problem with using/installing qt? Both qt-2.2.3 and qt1x-1.45 are installed on my RedHat 7.0. What problem are you having? -- Hans Dulimarta, Ph.D. | dul...@co... Research Associate | http://www.egr.msu.edu/~dulimart P: 517-432-7589 | http://corelinux.sourceforge.net F: 760-281-7691 http://freshmeat.net/projects/snapsource Elec. & Comp. Engg., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824 |
|
From: Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@MI...> - 2001-02-28 15:09:53
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 28 February 2001 00:07, you wrote: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 February 2001 19:20, you wrote: > > > > do you have a problem with using/installing qt? > > Both qt-2.2.3 and qt1x-1.45 are installed on my RedHat 7.0. > What problem are you having? I have no problem :) it was more like: I use qt for the parser and is it a problem for you to = install it ? qt 2.2.x series is fine C. - --=20 | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix | | Travailler dur n'a jamais tu=E9 personne, mais pourquoi prendre le risq= ue ? | -- Edgar Bergen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqdFJMACgkQoY+0C9S+FFBFCwCfULH6sUhT9/kNdjZyPxR1BKNJ vQcAmwUu6WJL3DwQxMf186a4b3Q5Qtks =3DGMXr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 2001-02-28 17:12:44
|
Christophe, I understand the ease of use that the Qt parser may offer, but we don't want the dependency. There must be a more "less demanding" straight XML parser framework that won't wed us to Qt or any other gui based framework no? Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 28 February 2001 00:07, you wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday 27 February 2001 19:20, you wrote: >>> >>> do you have a problem with using/installing qt? >> >> Both qt-2.2.3 and qt1x-1.45 are installed on my RedHat 7.0. >> What problem are you having? > > I have no problem :) > it was more like: I use qt for the parser and is it a problem for you to install it ? > qt 2.2.x series is fine > C. > - -- > | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm > | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix > | > | Travailler dur n'a jamais tué personne, mais pourquoi prendre le risque ? > | -- Edgar Bergen > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAjqdFJMACgkQoY+0C9S+FFBFCwCfULH6sUhT9/kNdjZyPxR1BKNJ > vQcAmwUu6WJL3DwQxMf186a4b3Q5Qtks > =GMXr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Corelinux-develop mailing list > Cor...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop > > > |
|
From: Hans - D. <dul...@eg...> - 2001-02-28 17:20:38
|
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Frank V. Castellucci wrote: > Christophe, > I understand the ease of use that the Qt parser may offer, but we don't > want the dependency. > > There must be a more "less demanding" straight XML parser framework that > won't wed us to Qt or any other gui based framework no? > Regarding the dependency, I agree. We should not create a "visibility link" to a big package like qt. How about the libxml10 package? > Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wednesday 28 February 2001 00:07, you wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > >> > >>> On Tuesday 27 February 2001 19:20, you wrote: > >>> > >>> do you have a problem with using/installing qt? > >> > >> Both qt-2.2.3 and qt1x-1.45 are installed on my RedHat 7.0. > >> What problem are you having? > > > > I have no problem :) > > it was more like: I use qt for the parser and is it a problem for you t= o install it ? > > qt 2.2.x series is fine > > C. > > - -- > > | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm > > | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix > > | > > | Travailler dur n'a jamais tu=E9 personne, mais pourquoi prendre le ri= sque ? > > | -- Edgar Bergen > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) > > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > > > iEYEARECAAYFAjqdFJMACgkQoY+0C9S+FFBFCwCfULH6sUhT9/kNdjZyPxR1BKNJ > > vQcAmwUu6WJL3DwQxMf186a4b3Q5Qtks > > =3DGMXr > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Corelinux-develop mailing list > > Cor...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Corelinux-develop mailing list > Cor...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop > --=20 Hans Dulimarta, Ph.D. | dul...@co... Research Associate | http://www.egr.msu.edu/~dulimart P: 517-432-7589 | http://corelinux.sourceforge.net F: 760-281-7691 http://freshmeat.net/projects/snapsource Elec. & Comp. Engg., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824 |
|
From: Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@MI...> - 2001-02-28 17:26:02
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 28 February 2001 12:20, you wrote: > Christophe, > I understand the ease of use that the Qt parser may offer, but we don't > want the dependency. I am fully aware of that As I said the idea was to create a first fast development parser and play= with it a bit=20 to straighten the understanding of what is needed and how to do it > There must be a more "less demanding" straight XML parser framework tha= t > won't wed us to Qt or any other gui based framework no? certainly but I know qt programming and it is so very easy to use that I = couldn't resist :) the final parser won't be linked to Qt! the one I play with is just a test bed. regards C. - --=20 | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix | | It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to cre= ate him. | -Arthur C. Clarke -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqdNO8ACgkQoY+0C9S+FFCb2ACdGh6edl9BPpnJ90fZoCF9U7Zu TogAniu4/5k0YcaUoLFGSoOX6VhM7ISm =3DqnP7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 2001-02-28 17:35:16
|
Ok, thats fine. I am going to put my trust in you that it works, 'cause I'm not installing Qt, I have small amount of space :-< until I get a new Linux box, and I just installed MICO !!! FC Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 28 February 2001 12:20, you wrote: > >> Christophe, >> I understand the ease of use that the Qt parser may offer, but we don't >> want the dependency. > > I am fully aware of that > As I said the idea was to create a first fast development parser and play with it a bit > to straighten the understanding of what is needed and how to do it > >> There must be a more "less demanding" straight XML parser framework that >> won't wed us to Qt or any other gui based framework no? > > certainly but I know qt programming and it is so very easy to use that I couldn't resist :) > > the final parser won't be linked to Qt! > the one I play with is just a test bed. > > regards > C. > - -- > | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm > | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix > | > | It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him. > | -Arthur C. Clarke > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAjqdNO8ACgkQoY+0C9S+FFCb2ACdGh6edl9BPpnJ90fZoCF9U7Zu > TogAniu4/5k0YcaUoLFGSoOX6VhM7ISm > =qnP7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Corelinux-develop mailing list > Cor...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop > > > |
|
From: Christophe Prud'h. <pru...@MI...> - 2001-02-28 17:46:10
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 28 February 2001 12:42, you wrote: > Ok, thats fine. I am going to put my trust in you that it works, 'cause > I'm not installing Qt, I have small amount of space :-< until I get a > new Linux box, and I just installed MICO !!! is qt that big once compiled? I am not sure=20 Mico might be bigger :) as for less demanding xml libs do you have any suggestions ? otherwise I'll go to write the stuff myself C. - --=20 | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix | | Do nothing unless you must, and when you must act hesitate. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqdOakACgkQoY+0C9S+FFAAyQCfcrUfIgRz+ktJQfoRKty1FYsW QKYAnR8BiwALs/72Ivx/0mMfImgvTbbc =3DW4rV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Frank V. C. <fr...@co...> - 2001-02-28 18:24:24
|
I believe I am better served by having MICO on the box for the near term :) Anyway, there are a number of RDF parsers (which we would wan't to use anyway) that are written in 'C'. Have a look through http://www.SemanticWeb.org Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 28 February 2001 12:42, you wrote: > >> Ok, thats fine. I am going to put my trust in you that it works, 'cause >> I'm not installing Qt, I have small amount of space :-< until I get a >> new Linux box, and I just installed MICO !!! > > is qt that big once compiled? I am not sure > Mico might be bigger :) > > as for less demanding xml libs do you have any suggestions ? > otherwise I'll go to write the stuff myself > > C. > - -- > | Christophe Prud'homme, http://augustine.mit.edu/~prudhomm > | ICQ UIN: 24560867 Alias: Jesunix > | > | Do nothing unless you must, and when you must act hesitate. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAjqdOakACgkQoY+0C9S+FFAAyQCfcrUfIgRz+ktJQfoRKty1FYsW > QKYAnR8BiwALs/72Ivx/0mMfImgvTbbc > =W4rV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Corelinux-develop mailing list > Cor...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/corelinux-develop > > > |