#84 state that docs format C++ syntax closer to lib syntax (void), public, etc

[Lorenzo Caminiti]

Note that the preceding example was just a function declaration with no
macros, so I guess MSVC will be able to take care of

bool empty ( ) const;

isn't it?

Oops, no macros... so sure you can use empty ( ) instead of empty (
void ) but I'm always using a C++ declaration syntax that looks more
closely to the library's declaration syntax so programmers get more
familiar with it (e.g., ( void ), public:, etc). I'll mention this
rationale in the docs.

[Lorenzo Caminiti]

• status changed from new to accepted

[Lorenzo Caminiti]

• summary changed from state that docs use C++ syntax closer to lib syntax (void), public, etc to state that docs format C++ syntax closer to lib syntax (void), public, etc