shall I support "new" virtual specifier?

Contract Programming Library for C++

Status: Pre-Alpha

Brought to you by: lcaminiti

#81 shall I support "new" virtual specifier?

Milestone: 1.0.0

Status: accepted

Owner: Lorenzo Caminiti

Labels: None

Resolution:

Component: Functionality

Priority: minor

Version: 0.4.1

Type: task

Updated: 2012-09-10

Created: 2012-09-10

Creator: Lorenzo Caminiti

Private: No

Is the "new" virtual specifier part of C++11? It probably only makes sense to strictly support what went in C++11 so I can use C++11 native virtual specifiers on C++11 compilers.

Discussion

Lorenzo Caminiti - 2012-09-10

status changed from new to accepted
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

shall I support "new" virtual specifier?

Contract Programming Library for C++

Milestone

Searches

Help

#81 shall I support "new" virtual specifier?

Discussion