From: Richard S. <csa...@ui...> - 2004-03-08 09:36:30
|
Ups, I forgot to reply to the list. =2DRichard =2D--------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---------- Subject: Re: [Config4gnu-developer] New Architecture+WBEM Stuff Date: Montag 08 M=E4rz 2004 07:12 =46rom: Richard Spindler <csa...@ui...> To: Justin Yackoski <ju...@sk...> Zitat von Justin Yackoski <ju...@sk...>: > On 04 Mar 2004 11:51:29 +0100 > > Richard Spindler <csa...@ui...> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have I little Question concerning the future Direction of CFG. > > > > > > Will it be possible with the new architecture, to have full local > > access to the CFG System without the need to run a > > WBEM/CIM/Whatever-Server? > > Do you mean using the fancy GUI or do you just mean being able to have so= me > sort of interface to CFG (an API or script-accessible way to get at ALL t= he > data)? If you're referring to the first case, no. If its second case, > well, script-accessiblity and an API will satisfy all my needs. > under the proposed method our data will be natively stored in WBEM/CIM > format, so you'll either need to speak that or we may have an alternate > XML-based format, but I don't know how exactly we'd describe our XML > format... right now we use our type definitions, Jason how would we do th= is > in the new model? =2DRichard =2D------------------------------------------------------ |