Re: [Compilercache-general] Hmm, an idea came up my mind...

[Erik T. <er...@er...>]

On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:45:04AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 09:45:04AM +0000, Robert McQueen wrote:
> > ... You end up with multiple directories in
> > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/ such as 2.95.4, and can use command line
> > parameters to gcc to switch compiler versions.
> 
> This case is no problem at all: to quote from the README file:
> 
>     But if I change compiler options like -D_REENTRANT_ or -O2 or -g ?
>     That's actually an easy point. compilercache puts the commandline
>     options also into the cache. If you use other commandline options,
>     recompilation will take place.
> 
> So different command line options (e.g. to choose the
> compiler version) will lead to different cache files.  The
> only problem is the case, when the same command line, say
> "gcc -c test.c", suddenly should lead to different output, because
> the default behaviour of gcc changed.

no this is no problem since the output of "gcc -v" is also used for
hash value computation. you'll never get the output of a gcc-1
compiler when compiling exactly the same file with exactly the same
options but a gcc-2 compiler.

> 
> Jochen
> -- 
> http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Compilercache-general mailing list
> Com...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/compilercache-general
-- 
Name:  Erik Thiele                                        \\\\
Email: er...@er...                                 o `QQ'_
WWW:   http://www.erikyyy.de/                              /   __8
                                                           '  `