#4582 System Registration - pdf watermark on 2.6.0c

R2.6.0
closed
5
2007-10-06
2007-09-20
contract16
No

Hi,

We already have Compiere_260c version deployed on production box, that we can't upgrade to any of the new compiere release right now. We are not able
to run he RUN_Support script to update licensing information to get rid of 'Demo Version' waterwark in all PDF documents.

Steps to reproduce,

1. Execute RUN_setup.sh
2. Execute RUN_ImportReference.sh
2. Go to Compiere2/utils and run ./RUN_Support.sh
3. Enter all required asset information (as mentioned under webstore/My
Asset)
4. Click Ok, system shows some unreadable message
5. 'Start Migration' button doesn't get enable.

As a result 'Demo Version' water mark still exists in all PDF documents.

Please advice....

If you point to 260c database via 261 binary, RUN_Support.sh script works fine and 'Demo Version' disappears. Would like to know your opinion on this approach.

Discussion

  • contract16

    contract16 - 2007-09-20
    • priority: 5 --> 7
     
  • contract16

    contract16 - 2007-09-20

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1742483
    Originator: YES

    Attached find the 260c system registration (RUN_Support) screen shot for your reference.
    File Added: Screenshot-ComPiere Support260c.png

     
  • Felipe Reyes

    Felipe Reyes - 2007-09-21
    • labels: 517461 -->
     
  • Felipe Reyes

    Felipe Reyes - 2007-09-21
    • summary: System Registration --> System Registration - pdf watermark on 2.6.0c
    • milestone: --> R2.6.0
    • labels: --> Installation Problem (until you can log in)
     
  • Felipe Reyes

    Felipe Reyes - 2007-09-21
    • status: open --> pending
     
  • Felipe Reyes

    Felipe Reyes - 2007-09-21

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1793135
    Originator: NO

    Using 2.6.1 code on a 2.6.0 database is not recommended.

    How did you start getting this problem? is it a new installation?
    The resolution of this problem requires a manual process. Please send an email to support@compiere.com to send you the required files.

     
  • contract16

    contract16 - 2007-09-26
    • assigned_to: nobody --> kviiksaar
    • status: pending --> open
     
  • Kai Egbert

    Kai Egbert - 2007-09-26

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1784380
    Originator: NO

    Hi,
    As we have discussed last time I was in UK you should take 2.6.0d for RUN_Support and migrate your version also to 2.6.0d before migrating to any other version.
    Or do you have any new issues on that? Because you only reopened this request and didn't add a comment.
    Regards,
    Kai

     
  • Kai Egbert

    Kai Egbert - 2007-09-26
    • status: open --> pending
     
  • contract16

    contract16 - 2007-09-28
    • priority: 7 --> 5
    • status: pending --> open
     
  • Kai Egbert

    Kai Egbert - 2007-09-28
    • status: open --> pending
     
  • Kai Egbert

    Kai Egbert - 2007-09-28

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1784380
    Originator: NO

    Hi Sachin,

    In our phone call yesterday we decided that you test to register the system with 2.6.0d as soon as possible. Have you tested it already?

    Thanks,

    Kai

     
  • SourceForge Robot

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1312539
    Originator: NO

    This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
    previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
    did not respond within 7 days (the time period specified by
    the administrator of this Tracker).

     
  • SourceForge Robot

    • status: pending --> closed
     

Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks