|
From: Kurt R. <ku...@ra...> - 2000-11-30 01:53:04
|
I have two ideas: 1. Why not create some sort of text-based spreadsheet-like output format for getting a quick visual overivew of a node's stats? 2. It might be nice if there was a option to parsech that would flag and print a note about errors found in the input, instead of silently ignoring them. -Kurt On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 08:27:59PM -0500, Scott Fenton wrote: > OK, if any of you have been paying attention to CVS lately, > you'll notice that I've been making quite a few changes to > parsech. I'm writing this to explain these changes, and > why I'm doing them. > > First, the what. I'm working to make each subroutine less > dependent on others. Ulimatly, there will only be the %Opts > hash as a universal variable. Even though I haven't checked > it into CVS yet (there are a few kinks in the system), I've > begun the final stage of all of this on one of the subs. > > Now, the why. Quite simply, I'm working to break up parsech. > I believe it has become an ugly hairball that will be > impossible to maintain eventually. I'm going to give ParseCH.pm > another try, see if I can get it this time. > > Thoughts? Suggestions? Jelly doughnuts? Reply with them. > > -Scott > > -- > pub 1024D/B5A525FA 2000-08-26 Scott Fenton <sj...@ra...> > sub 1024g/A41E2502 2000-08-26 > _______________________________________________ > Comp-hist-devel mailing list > Com...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/comp-hist-devel |