Re: [Comp-hist-devel] Parser issues

[Kurt R. <ku...@ra...>]

I suppose we could pull the <BR> tag out of the HTML DTD, although then we should also make the "link" tag function as a link within the browser, if it doesn't already.  Under what license are the W3C DTDs? If it permits use in derivative works, then we should be fine.  If not, then we may have problems.

-Kurt
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 05:50:06PM -0400, Scott Fenton wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 03:44:19PM -0400, the keyboard of Kurt Raschke was alleged to have written:
> > I've been looking over the output of the XML parser, and I see a few bugs.  For onw thing, a number of the dates are fouled up, and yet they are correct in the data files.  Also, some of the nodes that use a status field have invalid entries.  Also, are there plans to integrate an html output function into parsech?
> 
> I noticed that too. I can't figure out why that happens, though. And yes, I will soon add html to the targets (along with correct VCG and GViz).
> 
> > 
> > On a related note, what is the current handling of \n in parsech?  I know the C parsers don't seem to translate it to a CR, or a <p> in html.
> > 
> 
> \n was always handled by the dot and VCG tools themselves, so I'm still debating how to handle it in parsech. However, a <br /> tag in CHML would nice.
> 
> -Scott
> 
> 
> -- 
> pub  1024D/B5A525FA 2000-08-26 Scott Fenton <sj...@ra...>
> sub  1024g/A41E2502 2000-08-26 
> _______________________________________________
> Comp-hist-devel mailing list
> Com...@li...  
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/comp-hist-devel