Menu
▾
▴
comp-hist-devel
|
From: Kurt R. <ku...@ra...> - 2000-11-12 15:23:36
|
Well, we're now somewhat closer to 1.0 with the release of 0.9.1, and so I thought that this would be an ideal time to discuss what needs to be done. I've taken some of this from doc/goals, but it hasn't been updated in a long time, and thus isn't an accurate indicator. So, I'm just going to give a list of what I think needs to be done: Sun and SGI have directories and corp entries, but no data other that that. Well, actually the Solaris and SunOS trees are done, but that's it. The Mac hardware tree is a mess. It's partially complete, and I'm not sure what to do with it. The Palm tree is on its way to being done, since the only thing that needs to be finished is PalmOS. The NeXT hardware tree is not moving, due to a lack of resources. We may want to do something about this. There have been between 2-3 web form submissions that haven't been dealt with, although it's completely possible that they were dealt with and I just missed it. Anyway, if you go to the following URL, you can see all of the submissions: http://www.geocrawler.com/search/?config=5378&words=web+submission+form+feedback Finally, parsech isn't done yet, and I think that that is a definite prerequisite for the release of 1.0. Scott and others, feel free to add to this, since I'm not completely sure of what needs to be done. -Kurt |
|
From: Scott F. <sj...@ra...> - 2000-11-12 19:52:54
|
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 10:23:32AM -0500, the keyboard of Kurt Raschke was alleged to have written: > Well, we're now somewhat closer to 1.0 with the release of 0.9.1, and so I thought that this would be an ideal time to discuss what needs to be done. I've taken some of this from doc/goals, but it hasn't been updated in a long time, and thus isn't an accurate indicator. So, I'm just going to give a list of what I think needs to be done: > Sun and SGI have directories and corp entries, but no data other that that. Well, actually the Solaris and SunOS trees are done, but that's it. I'm afraid that Sun and SGI HW will be hard to do, seeing as the two corp websites are utterly useless. > The Mac hardware tree is a mess. It's partially complete, and I'm not sure what to do with it. > The Palm tree is on its way to being done, since the only thing that needs to be finished is PalmOS. > The NeXT hardware tree is not moving, due to a lack of resources. We may want to do something about this. > There have been between 2-3 web form submissions that haven't been dealt with, although it's completely possible that they were dealt with and I just missed it. Anyway, if you go to the following URL, you can see all of the submissions: > http://www.geocrawler.com/search/?config=5378&words=web+submission+form+feedback > > Finally, parsech isn't done yet, and I think that that is a definite prerequisite for the release of 1.0. How is parsech not done? I mean, the only time we'll add to it is for new formats. > Scott and others, feel free to add to this, since I'm not completely sure of what needs to be done. > > -Kurt > _______________________________________________ > Comp-hist-devel mailing list > Com...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/comp-hist-devel -- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDmoHL8RBACt7yc65iKzR4IW2kKF0wjfZlRVwcwEws6HueM9uKF6HCzyFtyM XJiHz8f3LI2NY/GedfF+XTFc2zQlPummiOrHfAx9Y2hV4ajEpxNgqm36BT21vLuI iTB6roHHm+EiK9dRINyc+kB4v5QV5S9BGxPuygm/3yLZLmGH6RUmSxis1wCgvGnX n3qhbP7Yf/mLO1Du3oEJhR8EAI+TFhyxg3y2xv++xCxKOL9ofF+wPA4EkXPCAokW 10hDmeGY246wOMPWC0Hou1QJqqRN82n5BbJAzUnE/Iht82SEJgM1vhIbp0uShUdS jzKPnBBUTzLQFPbAG9hDaU/98JklsyDIbacavCuCtky6Xs/wmPjESUJsIl6FiHRv Uz9jA/96nxsDQ8YMEr51F3sHubn7BwrYqGOZLT5btLMG1i9OnWyy0npQ5wKvM2bT t2i6QPcHydTAkX+DLXQv8UeJE+Qpq+duoofMpxdFOKgqW3x0kKWGP14UoOqSQFGL K4fStiwR7fCtExrMFKUHaP5Sij7v8VoyBtyK+w45LoWFFXsPeLQhU2NvdHQgRmVu dG9uIDxzajEyZm5AcmFzY2hrZS5uZXQ+iFYEExECABYFAjmoHL8ECwoEAwMVAwID FgIBAheAAAoJEGtrXbm1pSX6WZoAnRzHUYn+/MSVAsmK7bLJrAfmn8Y+AJ4uzZEX OxVuc0sGg/J0AqlYNpMcqrkBDQQ5qBzcEAQAhJgZzAKBjuKwS0owgknuN+5kSu9U tk75ZKRpBMTFfW1Js2E5v96M3Z4XAvyJFhQYaXWZn0QQY4PkrbbfKib4X3Onn/Gx M1mdtWKAXxb1+JuEH/dpVemt2EDLn6b2VVI5iE6U0HcrJjkvt7DLKsvQFRnnqd6M SHdN3XmxhY+VakcAAwUD/iTTv+fpM+Nn2izo7z0BmRu/+GwQgvOF8Qc+8YA6JgaA UUrD7nO3xUpkoK6gr1se2Wu98BFv2GSKRZZF9QljXn2vGNreYRRI9ZhWpKm3zflz uC7lz63QaiZdAPup37yWYXyaAvUvYufORC4hS9mZUgKbbOC+O6xdzkLBerBk/FK+ iEYEGBECAAYFAjmoHNwACgkQa2tdubWlJfqAvQCfWMWnlCab4pUJEvE4gjSFJ+EV 5LsAn2yeJT+7MWYKIQpPmGMMjeGkykK1 =tjOP -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- |
|
From: Kurt R. <ku...@ra...> - 2000-11-13 01:38:30
|
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 02:52:49PM -0500, Scott Fenton wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 10:23:32AM -0500, the keyboard of Kurt Raschke was alleged to have written: > > Well, we're now somewhat closer to 1.0 with the release of 0.9.1, and so I thought that this would be an ideal time to discuss what needs to be done. I've taken some of this from doc/goals, but it hasn't been updated in a long time, and thus isn't an accurate indicator. So, I'm just going to give a list of what I think needs to be done: > > Sun and SGI have directories and corp entries, but no data other that that. Well, actually the Solaris and SunOS trees are done, but that's it. > > I'm afraid that Sun and SGI HW will be hard to do, seeing as the two corp websites are utterly useless. However, that doesn't mean that there won't be other sites that provide useful information. > > > The Mac hardware tree is a mess. It's partially complete, and I'm not sure what to do with it. > > The Palm tree is on its way to being done, since the only thing that needs to be finished is PalmOS. > > The NeXT hardware tree is not moving, due to a lack of resources. We may want to do something about this. > > There have been between 2-3 web form submissions that haven't been dealt with, although it's completely possible that they were dealt with and I just missed it. Anyway, if you go to the following URL, you can see all of the submissions: > > http://www.geocrawler.com/search/?config=5378&words=web+submission+form+feedback > > > > Finally, parsech isn't done yet, and I think that that is a definite prerequisite for the release of 1.0. > > How is parsech not done? I mean, the only time we'll add to it is for new formats. OK, I was confused, parsech IS done. > > > Scott and others, feel free to add to this, since I'm not completely sure of what needs to be done. > > > > -Kurt > > _______________________________________________ > > Comp-hist-devel mailing list > > Com...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/comp-hist-devel > > -- > pub 1024D/B5A525FA 2000-08-26 Scott Fenton <sj...@ra...> > sub 1024g/A41E2502 2000-08-26 > _______________________________________________ > Comp-hist-devel mailing list > Com...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/comp-hist-devel |
|
From: Kurt R. <ku...@ra...> - 2000-11-13 01:52:10
|
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 02:52:49PM -0500, Scott Fenton wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 10:23:32AM -0500, the keyboard of Kurt Raschke was alleged to have written: > > Well, we're now somewhat closer to 1.0 with the release of 0.9.1, and so I thought that this would be an ideal time to discuss what needs to be done. I've taken some of this from doc/goals, but it hasn't been updated in a long time, and thus isn't an accurate indicator. So, I'm just going to give a list of what I think needs to be done: > > Sun and SGI have directories and corp entries, but no data other that that. Well, actually the Solaris and SunOS trees are done, but that's it. > > I'm afraid that Sun and SGI HW will be hard to do, seeing as the two corp websites are utterly useless. > > > The Mac hardware tree is a mess. It's partially complete, and I'm not sure what to do with it. > > The Palm tree is on its way to being done, since the only thing that needs to be finished is PalmOS. > > The NeXT hardware tree is not moving, due to a lack of resources. We may want to do something about this. > > There have been between 2-3 web form submissions that haven't been dealt with, although it's completely possible that they were dealt with and I just missed it. Anyway, if you go to the following URL, you can see all of the submissions: > > http://www.geocrawler.com/search/?config=5378&words=web+submission+form+feedback > > > > Finally, parsech isn't done yet, and I think that that is a definite prerequisite for the release of 1.0. > > How is parsech not done? I mean, the only time we'll add to it is for new formats. While I ded make an earlier statement saying that parsech is done, now that I look at its VCG output, I found that it doesn't do dates. Tovcg did, so I don't know what happened there. Scott, I'd appreciate it if you could rectify this, since I'm getting rather confused by this situation. -Kurt > > > Scott and others, feel free to add to this, since I'm not completely sure of what needs to be done. > > > > -Kurt > > _______________________________________________ > > Comp-hist-devel mailing list > > Com...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/comp-hist-devel > > -- > pub 1024D/B5A525FA 2000-08-26 Scott Fenton <sj...@ra...> > sub 1024g/A41E2502 2000-08-26 > _______________________________________________ > Comp-hist-devel mailing list > Com...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/comp-hist-devel |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X