Re: [Colossus-developers] Random changes

[Barrie T. <bae...@gm...>]

On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Clemens Katzer
<lem...@sa...> wrote:
>> Here's a patch I had lying around which moves us over to using
>
> The patch looks ok to me, but I am slightly "in unfavour" of eliminating
> DevRandom totally.

I haven't read the patch, but
I'm in favour of keeping a developer usable deterministic random
stream. (i.e it isn't random)
For the same reason Clemens list. This is needed for beefing up tests.