From: Jaroslaw K. <ja...@zd...> - 2004-04-14 05:38:48
|
Sorry about that missing "yum". You're right - it shouldn't be called fedora anymore. I suggest "minimal working Fedora with apt-get". I wanted the image to be small, so instead of installing the full fedora on a partition and then dumping it to a file I started with a file and kept adding packages until I managed to bootstrap the base system without any unnecessary libraries. Basically what you're getting is: * everything needed to boot fedora and get the bash prompt (SysV init scripts and config stuff) * basic unix utilities * openssh client/server * nano text editor * vim text editor * apt-get o get anything else that might be needed. I've developed a script that produces this base system in a reliable and reproducible manner. The resulting filesystem is 280MB uncompressed which is about 200MB less than minimal fedora I could get using anaconda. apt-get is pretty good at geting the missing stuff after that. I was never successful at using YUM so obviously I forgot to include it. Looks like the tool can easily eat the whole available bandwidth downloading package headers yet it's about 30 times slower than apt-get (I'm using a low-latency, 512 kbps link). I never actually understood how one could prefer it to apt-get which is blazing fast. Jarek BTW. I'll update the image to contain "yum" package today. ----- Original Message ----- From: "morfic" <mo...@bb...> To: "Dan Milisic" <dmi...@ca...> Cc: <col...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:43 AM Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] Help on Fedora > i was commenting on the pressumptiousness of removing a core tool, what > you insiuate i should do would be better directed at the individual who > decided to get his "real" fedora/taste spread > you say a missing "setup" is having all the tools to get the job done in > there? :) > and why install yum? it's part of a plain install and you have to put > forth effort to remove it to spread your "real" fedora, it was he who > put his taste forth, i simple sought out an opportunity to try either > im not asking to get an image "to my taste" rather than that i say > "don't suggest what you prefer is what everyone should use, especially > if setup is missing" (no, no mention of setup in initial email) > how is it a time saver if you have to bring it back to a decent > unaltered state > > not that big of a deal, i just wont use it > i just wonder what Gentoo users would say if someone had a great Gentoo > timesaver that turns out to be debian? (smile, im joking ;P) > > > Dan Milisic wrote: > > > Thanks for the image Jarek... The FC image is a fantastic time-saver. > > > > morfic wrote: > > > >> why waste everyone's time with a fedora image that is no longer fedora > > > > > > Okay... if you don't like apt for whatever reason, use it once: > > "apt-get install yum" > > > > Not exactly a massive hardship.... sheesh. > > > > For what it's worth, you can apt/yum it to whatever you think a 'real' > > FC install is... all the tools necessary to get the job done easily > > are 'in there'. > > > > D. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > coLinux-devel mailing list > > coL...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > |