Re: [coLinux-devel] coLinux benchmarks

[Dan A. <da...@co...>]

On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:45:49AM -0400, Ian C. Blenke wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:22:56AM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Eyal Lotem wrote:
> > 
> > > I think the reason may be that Windows is using the
> > > disks better and making access faster. Perhaps DMA
> > > acceleration or some other feature is turned off on
> > > the Linux host side, making disk access slower on the
> > > Linux side.
> > 
> > No Windows was involved with these benchmarks in any way. I ran 
> > coLinux on Linux.
> 
> You ran coLinux on a Linux host? Perhaps I've missed something on the list..
> is there a native Linux kernel port now? An alternative to User Mode Linux
> is a rather big thing for me.

Yes, it's an alternative to User Mode Linux, thought it's a bit
early and doesn't have all the wide range of support tools and 
nifty stuff that UML has.

-- 
Dan Aloni
da...@co...