From: <ch...@to...> - 2004-03-24 13:30:49
|
Ok I could be totally off base with this but wouldn't putting the card in master mode bypass the mac address requirement? Here is an article that talks about building an AP that acts like a bridge on linux http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-wap.html?ca=dnt-429 iwconfig can tell the card to go to master mode. I do not know if this is suposed to be possible with all cards or not. Of course in this situation this would have to be set in windows. And the configuration software might not allow this. But maby it could be set with regedit. How does the ctrl click 2 interfaces rt click select "bridge these interfaces" work with wireless in XP ? My best guess is that it would have to set the card to master mode or it would not work at all or it does not create a true layer2 bridge. Just throwing some ideas out there. chris > Ronald Pijnacker wrote: >>>Ok, yeah, this one is easy. IEEE 802.11 specs require that wireless >>>cards only transmit packets with a source MAC that is their own. You can >>>ping your own machine because it's clever enough to deal with the packet >>>internally, but you can't ping the router because the packet never >>>leaves the card. >> >> >> Hmm... that explains the problem. I'll try with a cable... I do see the >> light on the wireless card blinking, though... > > Just to let you know that indeed it works when using a cable. Thanks for > saving me days of useless debugging effort. > > Ronald. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > |