From: Pat E. <pat...@ma...> - 2004-03-04 14:40:01
|
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:04:58 +0100 Karol Bryd <kb...@py...> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:43:52PM +0100, Marko Bozikovic wrote: > > Heh. A big SNAFU here :) > > > > Here's what I did: took the base Debian image, installed a few packages: > > less, vim, base-config, ssh. > > > > Then I changed sources.list to fetch stuff from unstable distribution, and > > did apt-get update, apt-get dist-upgrade. I did its magic, and everything > > worked fine until I rebooted coLinux. On the next boot I got this: > > > > > > Checking root file system... > > fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) > > /dev/cobd0: The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 262144 > > blocks > > The physical size of the device is 0 blocks > > Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt! > > > > /dev/cobd0: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. > > (i.e., without -a or -p options) > > > > This is because the initscripts package got updated and > /etc/init.d/checkroot.sh also, just edit it and change the line with > "rootcheck=yes" to "rootcheck=no". pardon my ignorance here, but isn't NOT checking root a little hackish of a solution? and also, isn't it a little not safe? I have fsck working on my gentoo images. Pat Erley |