From: Pat E. <pat...@ma...> - 2004-02-17 11:23:10
|
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 12:56:22 +0200 Nir Perry <ni...@em...> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding the patch (fdisk) - could be true, I didn't check that... anyone > can add on this one ? > > Regarding the CDs - I don't think the distribution makers have to change > anything - all the fake hardware works as is. All but that "cobd0" device > driver, as mentioned. > > Regarding the kernel - I think most distributions would work just fine with > the colinux as a kernel (based on the original kernel.org version, and not > the one of the distribution). In the past, I have used the generic kernel on > several distributions without any problem. > We could also precompile some kernels with the colinux patch, and some of > the patches used by specific distributions, and make those available instead > of full disk images. > > I think it is better to make colinux work out-of-the-box on available > distributions, without a need to modify them. There are way too many of > them. Best way is to be as close as possible to the "generic" kernel in > behavior. > > Nir > if it got to the point that no patches were needed to the kernel, I believe that we could boot any os that supports the host arch. Pat Erley (not saying that this is a bad thing, but I believe it's 'signifigantly harder' than what we're working with now) |