From: Matt B. <ma...@zi...> - 2004-01-31 21:05:16
|
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 10:46:56PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > I need to see more of these reports to find out whether the 30448=20 > number that fsck prints there is fixed. I also saw this today. While=20 > trying to debug it, It sometimes occurs and sometime doesn't, and only=20 > with that image.=20 FWIW, I made a smaller image (128M) by loop-mounting both and moving the files over; I got the same message on boot, this time 121793 blocks vs. the correct figure of 131072. Curious -- can I infer that there are disk-style images that do work? --=20 Matt Behrens <ma...@zi...> <http://www.zigg.com/> Life's too short to recompile what you don't hack. <http://www.debian.org/> |