Re: [coLinux-users] colinux 0.6.2 with pcap (snapshot coLinux-200 40710)

[Dan A. <da...@co...>]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:59:06AM -0000, gboutwel wrote:

> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:48:04AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> > > that could break stuff a lot for exsiting users
> > > what about checking for an exact match first and then going in
> > for the substring matching if there are no exact matches?
> > 
> > Right. That's better.
> 
>   Doesn't this apply to TAP too?  Last I looked they code and
> the matching is basically the same.  Why hasn't this come up
> with TAP?  If it has, how was it solved for TAP?  If not, then
> I should probably make the same fix for TAP.

Yes, it applies to TAP too.

>   Anyways, I was thing that instead of breaking out of the loop
> when I find an partial match, I'd keep going through the loop,
> checking each item with an full string match, if that is sucessfull
> then over-ride the partial match that's found, otherwise go with
> the first partial match.  Basically, it'd go with the first partial,
> unless an exact match was found.  And it'd only go through the
> loop once, instead of twice.

Okay, sounds good to me.

-- 
Dan Aloni
da...@co...