|
From: <st...@t2...> - 2004-08-24 17:55:15
|
Hi, people... I wrote a few days ago, i was the one that made problems with fsck and lo= st his Feodora partition :-(, i could never get it back to work. Anyway, i keeped on trying with coLinux, downloaded the minimal feodora c= ore 1 image and installed it. Then started downloading new packages untill i ha= d a nice configuration. Now i am writing from Mozilla in gnome... everything running in colinux e= xcept of course the X server which is cygwin. I have been working all the day long trying to make enlighted sound daemo= n to work. I have installed the esound of cygwin (binaries, version 0.2.35). I= run the server like this: $ esd -tcp -bind 192.168.1.1 -public -promiscuous=20 192.168.1.1 is the TAP interface in the windows side, as you know network= ing works all right because the X server works nice!. i try from the same cygwin console to play a sound, the one that comes wi= th esound to test: $ esdplay --server=3D192.168.1.1:16001 test.wav and i hear the beautifull "Hasta la vista, baby" from terminator. But anyway i try to do the same from coLinux: $ esdplay --server=3D192.168.1.1:16001 test.wav and i get nothing, not even an error message, esdplay executes with no pr= oblem. I also tried executing xmms with the esound plugin and instead of just fa= iling silently it shows me a very helpfull error message which says in other w= ords: "something doesn't work, try to change this situation" I also tried to run esdplay installing three versions of esound in colinu= x, none of them gave me a different result. The last version i tried was exactly = the same one which runs in cygwin, that not only is good because it matches t= he server but also because it was the version that worked ok in cygwin. Of c= ourse no positive results. I tried to see if esd is accepting the connections from colinux $ telnet 192.168.1.1 16001 Trying 192.168.1.1... Connected to 192.168.1.1. As you see there is no problem with the connection. I have no idea if the problem is from CoLinux, esound or the network configuration itself, or if its only destinity :( Any ideas? |