Re: [coLinux-users] Win2k and services.

[Patrick W. <pa...@im...>]

On Thursday 10 June 2004 04:07 am, ch...@to... wrote:
> bridging does not work with wireless...
> If by NAT you mean the crippled NAT called ICS that MS provides maby your
> problem is two lans that are the same network. Lots of wireless routers
> default to the 192.168.0.0/24 network and ICS also uses 192.168.0.0/24
> this is the only option in win2k

	FYI, it can also be changed in Win2k SP4.. after you enable it and let ICS=
=20
slam the IP for that adapter to 192...  I might have had to reboot or=20
disable/enable the adapter or something before it started working.  Of=20
course, this was with two physical adapters, not one physical and the TAP=20
one.  So try that if changing the wireless is harder or impractical.

later,
patbob

> but I think it may be possible to change
> it in XP after windows sets up ICS with the default. On 2k you must change
> the default network on the wireless router. (It may be possible to use the
> routing and remote access service but I think you need tools from the 2k
> server cd to configure it)
> >        I've been unsuccessful in getting the network working with either
> > the bridge or nat methods. Am using the Debian image.
> >
> > I got a little further with NAT but I suspect my routes were incorrect
> > because of my wireless router.
> >
> > My question is, is the "Routing and Remote Access" service needed under
> > win2k ? I hope not because that enables netbios. I couldn't find any
> > requirements list on the Wiki site.