From: Shao M. <sha...@gm...> - 2013-04-03 03:58:45
|
Since the patches are falling further behind modern Linux, it seems to be getting harder and harder to run a modern (think "non-end-of-life") Linux distribution in coLinux. Is the paravirt path one which coLinux could really take? Are there obstacles besides development time, such as design decisions needing to be revisited? - Shao Miller ________________________________________ From: yin sun [mailto:sun...@gm...] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 20:42 To: Shao Miller Cc: col...@li... Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] Porting a Kernel I had thought about this. the two approaches we can learn from is lguest and paravirt. basically colinux could be another architecture in kernel tree on host and guest implement something similar to paravirt-ops. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Shao Miller <sha...@gm...> wrote: What is the Linux kernel upstream position on any coLinux changes getting merged, or has there been any discussion about this? I'm sure some of the #ifndef CONFIG_COOPERATIVE changes might be considered to spaghettify the code, but have alternative strategies been pondered or proposed? - Shao ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ coLinux-devel mailing list coL...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel |