From: Vincent R. <vin...@fr...> - 2013-03-04 23:05:58
|
On 04/03/2013 23:01, H. Nestler wrote: > CoLinux was designed for long time for small hardware, and at a time > where no other virtualization was available for free. For now we have > better and faster computers, we have hardware virtualization support, and > we have VirtualBox for free. This all makes not necessary to go so deep > into kernel. coLinux is much nicer than full hardware emulators. Implementing the Linux kernel as a simple Windows user program is a great idea. I suppose that almost nothing is emulated (implemented, instead). I couldn't imagine something more efficient. I don't switch to a 64-bit OS because I would lose coLinux. -- Vincent Rivière |