From: Frédéric L. W. M. <lis...@pe...> - 2009-09-03 19:29:28
|
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Henry Nestler wrote: > Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: >> Is that combination supposed to run ? >> >> I ask because I want to do some tests with coLinux, but not like >> on Windows, where I use the stable coLinux snapshots with my >> Linux partition and don't run into a problem for a long time. >> >> I customized the 2.6.22.8 kernel, removing options I don't need, >> adding others (not drivers and such), am also willing to try out >> the 2.6.25 patches, but don't want get lots of BSOD's if things >> go wrong. >> >> What if I run coLinux inside VirtualBox's VM, that has Windows >> XP SP3 ? Is it supposed to work ? But if it does, can it hide >> problems that may arise when I use the same kernel on plain >> Windows ? >> > Of curse you can run coLinux inside a VirtualBox machine. > > You should run XP (not Linux) inside VirtualBox to have the same host OS for > coLinux: > Any OS (Windows or Linux) --> VirtualBox --> Windows XP --> coLinux > > Please enable Physical Address Extension ("/PAE" in boot.ini file), if your > "stable" Windows also use it. You can see "Physical Address Extension" after > pressing Windows+Pause. > http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx > > There are no hiding problems from inside VirtualBox. Henry, it worked fine with a 2.6.22.18 kernel compiled using GCC 4.3.3. But running a 2.6.25 kernel compiled using your patches, I got colinux: error, expected kernel API version 13, got 11 error initializing daemon: exit code 82c6fc03 daemon: error driver version, please reinstall driver! Is it because the 4.1.2 x 4.3.3 ? But why 2.6.22.8 is accepted by the daemons and not 2.6.25 ? |