Menu
▾
▴
[coLinux-users] Unsubscribe
|
From: Joe P. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-05-09 12:21:21
|
Joseph A. Pederson e-mail: joe...@gm... blog: http://averynight.blogspot.com/ phone: 920.574.2552 On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:03 AM, <col...@li... > wrote: > Send coLinux-users mailing list submissions to > col...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > col...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > col...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of coLinux-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Newer kernels ... (Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier) > 2. Re: Newer kernels ... (Michael McStarfighter) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 18:36:48 -0300 (BRST) > From: Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier <lis...@pe...> > Subject: Re: [coLinux-users] Newer kernels ... > To: col...@li... > Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0905081836110.1852@pervalidus> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > I think it's starting to get old, because 2.6.22 was released almost two > years ago (8 july 2007). > > But while 2.6.22 works fine for me, even using it with my Linux partition, > in the near future a recent kernel will be badly needed, because ext4 will > be the default filesystem on most distributions. > > Anyway, to the developers. Does the task to port coLinux to a new kernel > becomes way harder if you don't follow all releases ? I guess that if > 2.6.25 wasn't an easy task - > http://www.henrynestler.com/colinux/testing/kernel-2.6.25/ -, moving from > 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 would be much harder. > > On Thu, 7 May 2009, Paolo Minazzi wrote: > > Hi Micheal, > porting a new kernel is not an easy task. > We need some time to test a kernel version and the first releases > obviously will have bugs. > The actual configuration is very stable, so I think that for now > 2.6.22 is not old. > Bye, > Paolo > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Michael McStarfighter wrote: > > A little question > > > > When will there be a newer kernel then the 2.6.22? Or are there any > reasons > > to do this not? > > > > Thanks for an answer ... > > > > > > Regards from Germany. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:42:04 +0200 > From: Michael McStarfighter <mcs...@gm...> > Subject: Re: [coLinux-users] Newer kernels ... > To: col...@li... > Message-ID: > <66c...@ma...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > That was one of the resons I asked. New filesystems like ext4, brtfs, and > some other nice things ... And also some new distributions gets enough > errors because the actual colinux doesn't understand some calls and so one > ... These are only examples ... > > 2009/5/8 Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier <lis...@pe...> > > > I think it's starting to get old, because 2.6.22 was released almost two > > years ago (8 july 2007). > > > > But while 2.6.22 works fine for me, even using it with my Linux > partition, > > in the near future a recent kernel will be badly needed, because ext4 > will > > be the default filesystem on most distributions. > > > > Anyway, to the developers. Does the task to port coLinux to a new kernel > > becomes way harder if you don't follow all releases ? I guess that if > > 2.6.25 wasn't an easy task - > > http://www.henrynestler.com/colinux/testing/kernel-2.6.25/ -, moving > from > > 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 would be much harder. > > > > On Thu, 7 May 2009, Paolo Minazzi wrote: > > > > Hi Micheal, > > porting a new kernel is not an easy task. > > We need some time to test a kernel version and the first releases > > obviously will have bugs. > > The actual configuration is very stable, so I think that for now > > 2.6.22 is not old. > > Bye, > > Paolo > > > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Michael McStarfighter wrote: > > > A little question > > > > > > When will there be a newer kernel then the 2.6.22? Or are there any > > reasons > > > to do this not? > > > > > > Thanks for an answer ... > > > > > > > > > Regards from Germany. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your > > production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks > to > > Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK > > i700 > > Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image > > processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com > > _______________________________________________ > > coLinux-users mailing list > > coL...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > ------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your > production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to > Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK > i700 > Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image > processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > > > End of coLinux-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 3 > ******************************************** > |
