Re: [coLinux-devel] "Console and daemons" related issue ...

[Paolo M. <pao...@gm...>]

For me both solution are good. It depends on personal taste ;=)
In my opinion the best solution is that every admin had her config.

Bye,
Paolo


On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Shyokou Ouyou <sh...@gm...> wrote:
> Just read the file, "NEWS.txt", and found a line under the section, "Console
> and daemons", of "Version 0.7.2", stating, "Stop with error, if double
> defined device (cobd,cofs,eth,exec)" ... but I think it would be better
> if the so-called "double defined" can be tolerated as a feature in a config
> file, dont you?
>
> On most of the boxes running coLinux/Linux here in this lab, two or more
> admins might modify the same config file; but they all keep the original one
> intact as the default backup, while adding their individual sections as if
> the parameter(s) "double defined" ... why ? at least, it is easy to read
> both the default and the modified parameter(s), and even easier to port some
> similar modifications with a single "diff -urN"; meanwhile, as a one-way
> modification, in some circumstances, it is easy to automatically update
> config file using patch algorithm.
>
> I wonder if it is acceptable to just warn about "double defined" rather than
> "Stop with error", and to be compatible with most of the script style config
> file, latter definition overrides any former one.
> Thanks
> --
> Shyokou Ouyou <sh...@gm...>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> coLinux-devel mailing list
> coL...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel
>
>