Re: [coLinux-users] 0.7.2 less reliable on dual core?

[baldyeti <e_...@ho...>]

Alright Henry first report (I am afraid we'll need
more testing if you're willing to bear with me)

On first start I got a straight reboot (no BSOD).
Sorry I stupidly deleted the debug.xml output.
Perhaps the new driver needed rebooting to get
activated ? Anyway after that I've got the new
version running *yet* there is this suspicious
line in debug.xml (whih I am sending to you):

Bug: PFN too high! 521536 > 491520

Anyway the rest of our discussion about PCI devices
and chunks of memory they use or shadow got me wondering.
Isn't colinux a user-land windows process, and as such
immune to those low-level, physical RAM layout issues?
Pardon my ignorance, I can imagine the driver being
somehow privileged, but I a am curious.

--bald