From: Louis <net...@ya...> - 2008-12-18 10:41:06
|
Hi, I have a 32-bit Windows system with "4 GB" of RAM, of which of course only 3GB is accessible, so I was wondering, would it be possible for coLinux to use that inaccessible 1 GB of RAM? Probably not, if it wants to stay in good terms with the Windows kernel huh? Yours, Louis |
From: Michael M. <mcs...@gm...> - 2008-12-18 11:28:29
|
I can say: No, it isn't possible. Why? The adress violation begins at the BIOS and the CPU directly. Windows can only use what the CPU and BIOS make available. And coLinux can't have more rights then the windows kernel ... 2008/12/18 Louis <net...@ya...> > Hi, > > I have a 32-bit Windows system with "4 GB" of RAM, of which of course only > 3GB is accessible, so I was wondering, would it be possible for coLinux to > use that inaccessible 1 GB of RAM? Probably not, if it wants to stay in good > terms with the Windows kernel huh? > > Yours, > > Louis > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > |
From: Sam M. <pa...@gm...> - 2008-12-18 12:29:02
|
Actually I think you'll find that for the most part this is actually a Windows limitation, see: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283037 Windows the operating system will limit the amount of memory that it can address even if the system can support more underneath. So whilst it might be an issue with the hardware, these days what is more than likely the case is that its an issue with Windows. Of course, it doesn't help that both Windows and the x86 instruction set are almost the worst performing products in the market (e.g. compared to say Linux and PPC respectively) so you're really in a doomed position to begin with anyway. Sam Moffatt http://pasamio.id.au On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Michael McStarfighter <mcs...@gm...> wrote: > I can say: No, it isn't possible. Why? The adress violation begins at the > BIOS and the CPU directly. Windows can only use what the CPU and BIOS make > available. And coLinux can't have more rights then the windows kernel ... > > 2008/12/18 Louis <net...@ya...> >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a 32-bit Windows system with "4 GB" of RAM, of which of course >> only 3GB is accessible, so I was wondering, would it be possible for coLinux >> to use that inaccessible 1 GB of RAM? Probably not, if it wants to stay in >> good terms with the Windows kernel huh? >> >> Yours, >> >> Louis >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >> Nevada. >> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >> >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> coLinux-users mailing list >> coL...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > > |
From: Michael M. <mcs...@gm...> - 2008-12-18 15:09:43
|
BTW: When will there be a x64 version of coLinux? Anything in the pipeline or the brains of the developers? 2008/12/18 Sam Moffatt <pa...@gm...> > Actually I think you'll find that for the most part this is actually a > Windows limitation, see: > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283037 > > Windows the operating system will limit the amount of memory that it > can address even if the system can support more underneath. So whilst > it might be an issue with the hardware, these days what is more than > likely the case is that its an issue with Windows. Of course, it > doesn't help that both Windows and the x86 instruction set are almost > the worst performing products in the market (e.g. compared to say > Linux and PPC respectively) so you're really in a doomed position to > begin with anyway. > > Sam Moffatt > http://pasamio.id.au > > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Michael McStarfighter > <mcs...@gm...> wrote: > > I can say: No, it isn't possible. Why? The adress violation begins at the > > BIOS and the CPU directly. Windows can only use what the CPU and BIOS > make > > available. And coLinux can't have more rights then the windows kernel ... > > > > 2008/12/18 Louis <net...@ya...> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a 32-bit Windows system with "4 GB" of RAM, of which of course > >> only 3GB is accessible, so I was wondering, would it be possible for > coLinux > >> to use that inaccessible 1 GB of RAM? Probably not, if it wants to stay > in > >> good terms with the Windows kernel huh? > >> > >> Yours, > >> > >> Louis > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, > >> Nevada. > >> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to > help > >> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > >> > >> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> coLinux-users mailing list > >> coL...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, > Nevada. > > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > coLinux-users mailing list > > coL...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > > > > > |
From: Xuefer <xu...@gm...> - 2008-12-18 16:52:08
|
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Michael McStarfighter <mcs...@gm...> wrote: > BTW: When will there be a x64 version of coLinux? Anything in the pipeline > or the brains of the developers? my top RFE 1. multi core 2. x64 3. share filesystem cache with host os, and activly return memory to host os i'm sure the user base is ready. ddr2 4G no more than 200RMB (RMB==CNY, 25~28 USD). 2/3/4 core is popular |
From: Henry N. <hen...@ar...> - 2008-12-18 16:53:43
|
Hello Michael Michael McStarfighter wrote: > BTW: When will there be a x64 version of coLinux? Anything in the > pipeline or the brains of the developers? I wrote a todo list and some notes about problems: http://colinux.wikia.com/wiki/Dashboard_for_developing_a_64_bit_coLinux Additinallny developer needs to have 64 bit Windows. I don't have it. -- Henry N. |