colinux-users — coLinux users mailing list

[coLinux-users] Top 10 reasons from list today

[Gawayne <Gaw...@OT...>]

Kristine was shocked by my new length after taking herbal pills http://www.asropes.com/

[coLinux-users] Great sex guaranteed

[krzetowski <viu...@IG...>]

I am a man so fine that your sister look me up every night for a great time. http://www.ceuneate.com/

[coLinux-users] Homemade sex videos

[Skledar <hyu...@1f...>]

Fulfil your lady's secret desires http://www.nueiakkela.com/

[coLinux-users] stunning cleavage of blonds

[leming <iva...@KI...>]

Lay her down and rock her hard http://www.powelakeg.com/

Re: [coLinux-users] Cofs problem

[Henry N. <Hen...@Ar...>]

nano bapt wrote:
> I recently play with colinux and I've a problem.
> 
> I have a network disk on windows I would like to access under colinux
> and I use cofs to do this. The problem is that when I'm creating a new
> file with colinux on this disk I can't list it :
> 
> # touch homelnx/coucou
> root@colinux:~# ls homelnx/   
> root@colinux:~# ls -l homelnx/coucou
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Jan 17 15:54 homelnx/coucou

Please give informations about your mount.
"mount | grep cofs"

Please lets see the directory and file rights via "stat homelnx
homelnx/coucou"

What version of coLinux you have used?
coLinux 0.7.2 has an option "nocache" (Disable directory caching).
Please try such mount:
  mount -t cofs cofs0 -o nocache /mnt/windows

-- 
Henry N.

[coLinux-users] sorry for dublicates

[Michael R. <mic...@fr...>]

I am sorry for posting my last message multiple times. I messed up. 
Fixed now. Sorry again.

[coLinux-users] merge the colinux project and the linux projct?

[Michael R. <mic...@fr...>]

The linux kernel has been already ported to loads of platforms. I see 
windows as "just another platform" since linux has also extensive 
support for running on "non-real" platforms (virtual machines, 
hypervisor, ...).

So why not merge this port inside the original linux kernel project?

[coLinux-users] merge the colinux project and the linux projct?

[Michael R. <mic...@fr...>]

The linux kernel has been already ported to loads of platforms. I see 
windows as "just another platform" since linux has also extensive 
support for running on "non-real" platforms (virtual machines, 
hypervisor, ...).

So why not merge this port inside the original linux kernel project?

[coLinux-users] merge the colinux project and the linux projct?

[Michael R. <mic...@fr...>]

The linux kernel has been already ported to loads of platforms. I see 
windows as "just another platform" since linux has also extensive 
support for running on "non-real" platforms (virtual machines, 
hypervisor, ...).

So why not merge this port inside the original linux kernel project?

[coLinux-users] A new poke

[katsnelson <tia...@AC...>]

Feed your desperation for more pleasures http://www.hihiyoe.com/

[coLinux-users] She showed me her perfect boobies

[vilka <vil...@DS...>]

I discovered the secret to my room mate's incredible bulge between his legs. http://www.rottsyk.com/

[coLinux-users] Seduce her like this

[Finnen <mar...@UF...>]

Ever look at the mirror and feeling a little small, be the giant you can be today. http://www.poreeajg.com/

Re: [coLinux-users] [coLinux-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Cooperative Linux 0.7.3-RC3 pre-release

[Leon S. <ma...@r2...>]

Ping back from R2X2 - http://www.r2x2.com/blog/?p=65
 

-----Original Message-----
From: col...@li...
[mailto:col...@li...] On Behalf Of Henry
Nestler
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:02 PM
To: Cooperative Linux Users; Cooperative Linux Development
Subject: [coLinux-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Cooperative Linux 0.7.3-RC3 pre-release

Hello,

release candidate 0.7.3-RC3 with kernel 2.6.22.18 is available from snapshot
page.
http://www.colinux.org/snapshots/

There has been fixed one of the most important boot problem (host reboots or
freeze before mounts root filesystem). Many other small bugs are fixed. For
details, please read the NEWS.
http://www.colinux.org/snapshots/stable-NEWS

After testing phase this will release out next weeks.

--
Henry N.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss
this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javao
ne
_______________________________________________
coLinux-devel mailing list
coL...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel

[coLinux-users] andLinux

[Jun O. <ok...@di...>]

You know this?
http://www.andlinux.org/
http://www.linux.com/feature/131753

                   --- Okajima, Jun. Tokyo, Japan.

Re: [coLinux-users] Colinux 0.7.2 hangs on startup XP

[Henry N. <Hen...@Ar...>]

Paolo Minazzi wrote:
> Hi colinux users.
> I have to say that 0.7.2 is not stable as 0.7.1.
> I'm using 0.7.2 (during last month) and today is the 2nd time it hangs my WinXP.
> 
> It hangs always (the 2 times) in the same point, at startup of the system.
> 
> .........
> TCP cubic Registered
> NET Registered protocol family 1
> NET Registered protocol family 17
> Using IPI Shortcut mode

To be clear for all users. Paolo and I wrote offlist some more and
hardly traced the boot up steps. We found the problem.

It is fixed in release candidate 0.7.3-RC3 now.

-- 
Henry N.

[coLinux-users] [ANNOUNCE] Cooperative Linux 0.7.3-RC3 pre-release

[Henry N. <Hen...@Ar...>]

Hello,

release candidate 0.7.3-RC3 with kernel 2.6.22.18 is available from
snapshot page.
http://www.colinux.org/snapshots/

There has been fixed one of the most important boot problem (host
reboots or freeze before mounts root filesystem). Many other small bugs
are fixed. For details, please read the NEWS.
http://www.colinux.org/snapshots/stable-NEWS

After testing phase this will release out next weeks.

-- 
Henry N.

Re: [coLinux-users] vista, samba and tuntap blocks

[Frank <col...@fr...>]

Hi David,

thanks for your hints - but the problem still exists.
- First I have deactivated the "Network discovery" : The Problem with 
the freeze still exists.
- Then I've stopped and deactivated the SSDP Discovery Service and the 
UPNP Device Host Service : The Problem with the freeze still exists.
 I checked with wireshark - now the problem came up without the bunch of 
SSDP-Messages send to the coLinux
- Next I've disabled the "auto tuning mode" of the "network window size" 
with "netsh int tcp set global autotuninglevel=disable" : The Problem 
with the freeze still exists.

I checked the behavior after each change and again after a  reboot 
before I say: still exists. None of the changes above solves the problem 
but I've left the features disabled and every next step was in addition.

Your suggestion to downgrade to XP ist not that funny - my new notebook 
only supports windows vista. The only chance may be a switch to an other 
virtualisation software - hoping the problem  disappears after that.
But I love coLinux ;-) it's that uncomlicated!

Frank
> Hi Frank,
>
> I don't run Vista, but can't you simply delete, disable or uninstall the 
> "Universal PNP" service from the list of services loaded in the TAP 
> adapter's "Network Connection" properties on Vista (like you can on XP)?
>
> I completely uninstalled UPNP from:
>
>  control-panel
>   /add-remove-programs
>     /add-remove-windows-components
>       /networking-services
>
> IMO, UPNP is just a big ginormous security hole anyway.  What is it 
> supposed to do, allow Windows to tell your LAN's router to open ports in 
> the firewall for P2P file-sharing apps and "discoverable" printers? 
> Please... like anyone would trust a Windows driver to automatically 
> reconfigure their LAN's router...
>
> I'm not surprised UPNP is fire-storming your TAP adapter.  But I'm running 
> Debian etch (on a recent colinux 0.8.0 snapshot too), I share files from 
> colinux's /home/* dirs with Windows quite extensively using Samba, I use 
> these shares heavily in my daily work from the Windows side with no 
> problems and have been doing so for a couple of years now (just to reassure 
> you that it *can* work).
>
> Maybe consider joining the rest of us in a warm, satisfying downgrade back 
> to XP? :-)
>
> -dave
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Frank" <col...@fr...>
> To: <col...@li...>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:17 PM
> Subject: [coLinux-users] vista, samba and tuntap blocks
>
>
>   
>> Hello everybody,
>> I have a strange behavior in setting up a tuntap connection between
>> coLinux and the Windows Vista Host. First I have to say - IT WORKS
>> INITIALLY - so it seems not to be one of the simple NTLMv2 problems
>> between vista and samba.
>> But one step after the other:
>> My setup:
>> - coLinux 0.8.0 (devel-20080329) from Henry Nestlers site
>> - TAP Win32 version 8.4 from Henry Nestlers site
>> - ubuntu 7.04
>> - Windows Vista Ultimate
>> - manually start coLinux (not as a deamon)
>>
>> After setting up everything and starting coLinux - it seems to work. My
>> tuntap adapter works with IP 192.168.0.1 on Vista and 192.168.0.2 on
>> ubuntu. The ssh-Login works and so on. After mapping a samba drive from
>> ubuntu into vista I can see my files and work with them.
>> BUT after approx. 15 Minutes the samba connection "blocks". The other
>> network connections like ssh are still alive and I can work with them;
>> but samba blocks. I've installed wireshark to see what happens and I
>> see, that directly before samba blocks vista sends a bunch of (UPNP)
>> multicast messages (IP 239.255.255.250) to ubuntu - and after that - the
>> samba connection seems to be broken !! from the vista point of view !!.
>> The samba server itself still sends echo-requests and is alife. The
>> reason, why I ask this question here is: If I set up a Microsoft
>> loopback-device with pcap-bridging - the connection stays stable - but
>> very very slow. In my opinion this may be a problem in the tuntap driver
>> or in coLinux.
>> Are there anybody here who knows this problem or has any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
>> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
>> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
>> _______________________________________________
>> coLinux-users mailing list
>> coL...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
> Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> coLinux-users mailing list
> coL...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users
>   

[coLinux-users] Ladies love up-sized rods

[anhyeuvn <sva...@1s...>]

Make her strip immediately with this http://www.buryeoag.com/

[coLinux-users] Love your device more

[okojj <seu...@3t...>]

I changed the meaning of joyride, when she bangs me in the car. http://www.ogepoge.com/

[coLinux-users] Time to repair your male plumbing

[joakimsen <esu...@Al...>]

Hang large, thick and muscular even when flaccid. http://www.weeabgein.com/

Re: [coLinux-users] vista, samba and tuntap blocks

[David K. <da...@gi...>]

Hi Frank,

I don't run Vista, but can't you simply delete, disable or uninstall the 
"Universal PNP" service from the list of services loaded in the TAP 
adapter's "Network Connection" properties on Vista (like you can on XP)?

I completely uninstalled UPNP from:

 control-panel
  /add-remove-programs
    /add-remove-windows-components
      /networking-services

IMO, UPNP is just a big ginormous security hole anyway.  What is it 
supposed to do, allow Windows to tell your LAN's router to open ports in 
the firewall for P2P file-sharing apps and "discoverable" printers? 
Please... like anyone would trust a Windows driver to automatically 
reconfigure their LAN's router...

I'm not surprised UPNP is fire-storming your TAP adapter.  But I'm running 
Debian etch (on a recent colinux 0.8.0 snapshot too), I share files from 
colinux's /home/* dirs with Windows quite extensively using Samba, I use 
these shares heavily in my daily work from the Windows side with no 
problems and have been doing so for a couple of years now (just to reassure 
you that it *can* work).

Maybe consider joining the rest of us in a warm, satisfying downgrade back 
to XP? :-)

-dave


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank" <col...@fr...>
To: <col...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:17 PM
Subject: [coLinux-users] vista, samba and tuntap blocks


> Hello everybody,
> I have a strange behavior in setting up a tuntap connection between
> coLinux and the Windows Vista Host. First I have to say - IT WORKS
> INITIALLY - so it seems not to be one of the simple NTLMv2 problems
> between vista and samba.
> But one step after the other:
> My setup:
> - coLinux 0.8.0 (devel-20080329) from Henry Nestlers site
> - TAP Win32 version 8.4 from Henry Nestlers site
> - ubuntu 7.04
> - Windows Vista Ultimate
> - manually start coLinux (not as a deamon)
>
> After setting up everything and starting coLinux - it seems to work. My
> tuntap adapter works with IP 192.168.0.1 on Vista and 192.168.0.2 on
> ubuntu. The ssh-Login works and so on. After mapping a samba drive from
> ubuntu into vista I can see my files and work with them.
> BUT after approx. 15 Minutes the samba connection "blocks". The other
> network connections like ssh are still alive and I can work with them;
> but samba blocks. I've installed wireshark to see what happens and I
> see, that directly before samba blocks vista sends a bunch of (UPNP)
> multicast messages (IP 239.255.255.250) to ubuntu - and after that - the
> samba connection seems to be broken !! from the vista point of view !!.
> The samba server itself still sends echo-requests and is alife. The
> reason, why I ask this question here is: If I set up a Microsoft
> loopback-device with pcap-bridging - the connection stays stable - but
> very very slow. In my opinion this may be a problem in the tuntap driver
> or in coLinux.
> Are there anybody here who knows this problem or has any suggestions?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> coLinux-users mailing list
> coL...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users
>
> 

[coLinux-users] vista, samba and tuntap blocks

[Frank <col...@fr...>]

Hello everybody,
I have a strange behavior in setting up a tuntap connection between 
coLinux and the Windows Vista Host. First I have to say - IT WORKS 
INITIALLY - so it seems not to be one of the simple NTLMv2 problems 
between vista and samba.
But one step after the other:
My setup:
- coLinux 0.8.0 (devel-20080329) from Henry Nestlers site
- TAP Win32 version 8.4 from Henry Nestlers site
- ubuntu 7.04
- Windows Vista Ultimate
- manually start coLinux (not as a deamon)

After setting up everything and starting coLinux - it seems to work. My 
tuntap adapter works with IP 192.168.0.1 on Vista and 192.168.0.2 on 
ubuntu. The ssh-Login works and so on. After mapping a samba drive from 
ubuntu into vista I can see my files and work with them.
BUT after approx. 15 Minutes the samba connection "blocks". The other 
network connections like ssh are still alive and I can work with them; 
but samba blocks. I've installed wireshark to see what happens and I 
see, that directly before samba blocks vista sends a bunch of (UPNP) 
multicast messages (IP 239.255.255.250) to ubuntu - and after that - the 
samba connection seems to be broken !! from the vista point of view !!. 
The samba server itself still sends echo-requests and is alife. The 
reason, why I ask this question here is: If I set up a Microsoft 
loopback-device with pcap-bridging - the connection stays stable - but 
very very slow. In my opinion this may be a problem in the tuntap driver 
or in coLinux.
Are there anybody here who knows this problem or has any suggestions?

Thanks in advance!

[coLinux-users] Bikini babes at Cancun

[emrah <emr...@AD...>]

I was vetted for a job recently and was amazed to find that my stunted phallus scored against me http://www.poliekagbi.com/

[coLinux-users] Length and girth competition champion

[Olea <Mon...@12...>]

I did a pair of teenage twins last night, they were rocking hot! http://www.poaliela.com/

[coLinux-users] Get your gigantic boost now

[Konrad <Kon...@PH...>]

Spice up your love life and excite her with a long, hard weapon. http://www.bunetiosin.com/