From: morfic <mo...@bb...> - 2004-04-24 02:16:34
|
John Nelson wrote: >> >> > There is a slight speed advantage with a partition... when you are > using a mounted image, you are reading a file system that exists > *within* another file system. This additional level adds overhead, so > a partition is a bit faster, albeit marginally. On the other hand, an > image file has significantly greater flexibility, as you can make new > "test" versions at will, keep old copies around, and so forth. I tend > to prefer the image approach since I seriously doubt that the slight > added speed of a real partition could possibly outweigh the problems > created by its inherent lack of flexibiity, especially when one > considers that you just might want to jumble images around every now > and then. > > you must not have benchmarked an image vs partition when you run an image you benefit from windows caching on top of linux' caching? don't believe me? run bonnie, bonnie++ or tiobench, but with memory settings at least 2x the amount the host machine has physical ram (bonnie suggests that) if you pick only twice the memory of the colinux guest you are getting higher results than when using twice the amount of the host, which shows thew effects of caching of the host now run the tests with memory settings of twice the guest and twice the host but on a physical partition, you will find those two results not only to be significantly lower than those of the images, but also you will see not much difference if using 2x guest ram or 2x host ram, which will show you that host caching doesnt happen here try it, you might be surprised, certainly you wont find what i said to be wrong :) |
From: <ch...@to...> - 2004-04-26 12:34:39
|
morfic, I think you may have taken this a little out of context. In the Quote what was meant by a "partition" was anything loaded by the coLinux config file and image was another filesystem image residing on the linux root. So if root is an image this would be an image in an image. But I don't think speed will be the deciding factor here. chris > > > John Nelson wrote: > >>> >>> >> There is a slight speed advantage with a partition... when you are >> using a mounted image, you are reading a file system that exists >> *within* another file system. This additional level adds overhead, so >> a partition is a bit faster, albeit marginally. On the other hand, an >> image file has significantly greater flexibility, as you can make new >> "test" versions at will, keep old copies around, and so forth. I tend >> to prefer the image approach since I seriously doubt that the slight >> added speed of a real partition could possibly outweigh the problems >> created by its inherent lack of flexibiity, especially when one >> considers that you just might want to jumble images around every now >> and then. >> >> > > you must not have benchmarked an image vs partition > > when you run an image you benefit from windows caching on top of linux' > caching? don't believe me? run bonnie, bonnie++ or tiobench, but with > memory settings at least 2x the amount the host machine has physical ram > (bonnie suggests that) if you pick only twice the memory of the colinux > guest you are getting higher results than when using twice the amount of > the host, which shows thew effects of caching of the host > > now run the tests with memory settings of twice the guest and twice the > host but on a physical partition, you will find those two results not > only to be significantly lower than those of the images, but also you > will see not much difference if using 2x guest ram or 2x host ram, which > will show you that host caching doesnt happen here > > try it, you might be surprised, certainly you wont find what i said to > be wrong :) > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek > For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 > or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! > http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > |
From: Robert P. <rob...@ho...> - 2004-04-19 20:59:00
|
Hi folks I have set up colinux 0.6.0 with Fedora Core 1 on Windows 2000 workstation. I am using Wincap driver and FC1 is obtaining its IP address via DHCP to the DHCP server in the LAN. The W2k has its static IP address. I have been thinking about somehow "sharing" the same static with FC1. I don't think real sharing is possible. Instead, I am thinking about doing a NAT translation in W2k to forward ports (e.g. ssh port 22) to FC1. I suspect that it should be possible with Windows 2000 Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) but I had no luck enabling ICS in W2k. I read in the net that ICS won't be possible if there is already a DHCP server in the LAN. Does anyone how about this? And assuming that I succeed in setting up ICS, how do I set up NAT to forward port 22 from W2k to FC1? Thanks. Rob |
From: Daniel R. S. <dan...@ya...> - 2004-04-19 21:31:50
|
I have this successfully working using Win XP. What you need to do is share your LAN connection with the Win-TAP adapter. The DHCP server on your LAN shouldn't cause a problem because in this case, your LAN is the "internet" while your Win-TAP adapter is the LAN. FC1 will then get it's NAT'd IP address from the W2k box. -----Original Message----- From: col...@li... [mailto:col...@li...] On Behalf Of Robert Pang Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:59 PM To: col...@li... Subject: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? Hi folks I have set up colinux 0.6.0 with Fedora Core 1 on Windows 2000 workstation. I am using Wincap driver and FC1 is obtaining its IP address via DHCP to the DHCP server in the LAN. The W2k has its static IP address. I have been thinking about somehow "sharing" the same static with FC1. I don't think real sharing is possible. Instead, I am thinking about doing a NAT translation in W2k to forward ports (e.g. ssh port 22) to FC1. I suspect that it should be possible with Windows 2000 Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) but I had no luck enabling ICS in W2k. I read in the net that ICS won't be possible if there is already a DHCP server in the LAN. Does anyone how about this? And assuming that I succeed in setting up ICS, how do I set up NAT to forward port 22 from W2k to FC1? Thanks. Rob ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ coLinux-devel mailing list coL...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel |
From: Robert P. <rob...@ho...> - 2004-04-20 18:56:12
|
Thanks to Daniel and Chris. I gave it another try with care and finally succeeded in setting up NAT with ICS on my W2k workstation. What Daniel said is true. My LAN is the "internet" and the Win-TAP adaptor is the LAN. The presence of a real DHCP server in my "internet" shouldn't interferce with ICS's DHCP as ICS should only serve DHCP to the Win-TAP adaptor but not to the "internet". What required of me so that it works now are that I need to enable the "DHCP Client" service on my W2k host and configure Win-TAP adaptor to obtain IP addr dynamically. I suppose this note should be added to coLinux's Wiki network HOWTO section. I am also trying to set up port forwarding from W2k to FC1. To forward the port, I need to specify the target host (IP addr) but the addr that FC1 gets keeps changing. Is there a way for FC1 to get a stable IP addr over DHCP or a way to point to FC1 in W2k's port-forwarding config regardless of the DHCP addr assigned to FC1? Thanks. Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: <ch...@to...> To: "Robert Pang" <rob...@ho...> Cc: <col...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:14 AM Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > for port forwarding in 2k. When you share the connection on the sharing > tab of the connection properties (physical lan connection) click the > settings button on the applications tab click the add button. you should > probably forward both 22 tcp and 22udp to the colinux host. you can even > translate the port so if you are running an shh server on cygwin in > windows it could use 22 and a higher unused port on windows could be > forwarded to 22 on colinux > > I hope this is right I have not tried it before. Sometimes on windows I > think I am on the right track and then figure out that the windows > designers had something totally different in mind ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel R. Slater" <dan...@ya...> To: <col...@li...> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:31 PM Subject: RE: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > I have this successfully working using Win XP. What you need to do is share > your LAN connection with the Win-TAP adapter. The DHCP server on your LAN > shouldn't cause a problem because in this case, your LAN is the "internet" > while your Win-TAP adapter is the LAN. FC1 will then get it's NAT'd IP > address from the W2k box. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: col...@li... > [mailto:col...@li...] On Behalf Of Robert Pang > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:59 PM > To: col...@li... > Subject: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > > Hi folks > > I have set up colinux 0.6.0 with Fedora Core 1 on Windows 2000 workstation. > I am using Wincap driver and FC1 is obtaining its IP address via DHCP to the > DHCP server in the LAN. The W2k has its static IP address. > > I have been thinking about somehow "sharing" the same static with FC1. I > don't think real sharing is possible. Instead, I am thinking about doing a > NAT translation in W2k to forward ports (e.g. ssh port 22) to FC1. I suspect > that it should be possible with Windows 2000 Internet Connection Sharing > (ICS) but I had no luck enabling ICS in W2k. I read in the net that ICS > won't be possible if there is already a DHCP server in the LAN. Does anyone > how about this? And assuming that I succeed in setting up ICS, how do I set > up NAT to forward port 22 from W2k to FC1? > > Thanks. > > Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > |
From: Daniel R. S. <dan...@ya...> - 2004-04-20 19:47:07
|
I believe that somewhere on your W2k box, you can specify the range of addresses ICS serves up. You could try restricting that range to 1 address. Unfortunately it has been quite a while since I've had to do this on W2k. On my WXP box, my colinux machine gets the same ip address every time it boots, so this isn't an issue for me. -----Original Message----- From: col...@li... [mailto:col...@li...] On Behalf Of Robert Pang Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:56 PM To: col...@li... Subject: [coLinux-devel] Re: NAT routing HOWTO - solved partially? Thanks to Daniel and Chris. I gave it another try with care and finally succeeded in setting up NAT with ICS on my W2k workstation. What Daniel said is true. My LAN is the "internet" and the Win-TAP adaptor is the LAN. The presence of a real DHCP server in my "internet" shouldn't interferce with ICS's DHCP as ICS should only serve DHCP to the Win-TAP adaptor but not to the "internet". What required of me so that it works now are that I need to enable the "DHCP Client" service on my W2k host and configure Win-TAP adaptor to obtain IP addr dynamically. I suppose this note should be added to coLinux's Wiki network HOWTO section. I am also trying to set up port forwarding from W2k to FC1. To forward the port, I need to specify the target host (IP addr) but the addr that FC1 gets keeps changing. Is there a way for FC1 to get a stable IP addr over DHCP or a way to point to FC1 in W2k's port-forwarding config regardless of the DHCP addr assigned to FC1? Thanks. Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: <ch...@to...> To: "Robert Pang" <rob...@ho...> Cc: <col...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:14 AM Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > for port forwarding in 2k. When you share the connection on the sharing > tab of the connection properties (physical lan connection) click the > settings button on the applications tab click the add button. you should > probably forward both 22 tcp and 22udp to the colinux host. you can even > translate the port so if you are running an shh server on cygwin in > windows it could use 22 and a higher unused port on windows could be > forwarded to 22 on colinux > > I hope this is right I have not tried it before. Sometimes on windows I > think I am on the right track and then figure out that the windows > designers had something totally different in mind ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel R. Slater" <dan...@ya...> To: <col...@li...> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:31 PM Subject: RE: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > I have this successfully working using Win XP. What you need to do is share > your LAN connection with the Win-TAP adapter. The DHCP server on your LAN > shouldn't cause a problem because in this case, your LAN is the "internet" > while your Win-TAP adapter is the LAN. FC1 will then get it's NAT'd IP > address from the W2k box. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: col...@li... > [mailto:col...@li...] On Behalf Of Robert Pang > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:59 PM > To: col...@li... > Subject: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > > Hi folks > > I have set up colinux 0.6.0 with Fedora Core 1 on Windows 2000 workstation. > I am using Wincap driver and FC1 is obtaining its IP address via DHCP to the > DHCP server in the LAN. The W2k has its static IP address. > > I have been thinking about somehow "sharing" the same static with FC1. I > don't think real sharing is possible. Instead, I am thinking about doing a > NAT translation in W2k to forward ports (e.g. ssh port 22) to FC1. I suspect > that it should be possible with Windows 2000 Internet Connection Sharing > (ICS) but I had no luck enabling ICS in W2k. I read in the net that ICS > won't be possible if there is already a DHCP server in the LAN. Does anyone > how about this? And assuming that I succeed in setting up ICS, how do I set > up NAT to forward port 22 from W2k to FC1? > > Thanks. > > Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ coLinux-devel mailing list coL...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel |
From: Richard G. <ric...@ri...> - 2004-04-20 22:12:12
|
FYI on XP you can no longer modify the ICS DHCP scope... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel R. Slater" <dan...@ya...> To: "'Robert Pang'" <rob...@ho...>; <col...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:46 PM Subject: RE: [coLinux-devel] Re: NAT routing HOWTO - solved partially? > I believe that somewhere on your W2k box, you can specify the range of > addresses ICS serves up. You could try restricting that range to 1 address. > Unfortunately it has been quite a while since I've had to do this on W2k. On > my WXP box, my colinux machine gets the same ip address every time it boots, > so this isn't an issue for me. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: col...@li... > [mailto:col...@li...] On Behalf Of Robert Pang > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:56 PM > To: col...@li... > Subject: [coLinux-devel] Re: NAT routing HOWTO - solved partially? > > Thanks to Daniel and Chris. I gave it another try with care and finally > succeeded in setting up NAT with ICS on my W2k workstation. What Daniel said > is true. My LAN is the "internet" and the Win-TAP adaptor is the LAN. The > presence of a real DHCP server in my "internet" shouldn't interferce with > ICS's DHCP as ICS should only serve DHCP to the Win-TAP adaptor but not to > the "internet". What required of me so that it works now are that I need to > enable the "DHCP Client" service on my W2k host and configure Win-TAP > adaptor to obtain IP addr dynamically. I suppose this note should be added > to coLinux's Wiki network HOWTO section. > > I am also trying to set up port forwarding from W2k to FC1. To forward the > port, I need to specify the target host (IP addr) but the addr that FC1 gets > keeps changing. Is there a way for FC1 to get a stable IP addr over DHCP or > a way to point to FC1 in W2k's port-forwarding config regardless of the DHCP > addr assigned to FC1? > > Thanks. > > Rob > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <ch...@to...> > To: "Robert Pang" <rob...@ho...> > Cc: <col...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:14 AM > Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > > > > for port forwarding in 2k. When you share the connection on the sharing > > tab of the connection properties (physical lan connection) click the > > settings button on the applications tab click the add button. you should > > probably forward both 22 tcp and 22udp to the colinux host. you can even > > translate the port so if you are running an shh server on cygwin in > > windows it could use 22 and a higher unused port on windows could be > > forwarded to 22 on colinux > > > > I hope this is right I have not tried it before. Sometimes on windows I > > think I am on the right track and then figure out that the windows > > designers had something totally different in mind > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel R. Slater" <dan...@ya...> > To: <col...@li...> > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:31 PM > Subject: RE: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > > > > I have this successfully working using Win XP. What you need to do is > share > > your LAN connection with the Win-TAP adapter. The DHCP server on your LAN > > shouldn't cause a problem because in this case, your LAN is the "internet" > > while your Win-TAP adapter is the LAN. FC1 will then get it's NAT'd IP > > address from the W2k box. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: col...@li... > > [mailto:col...@li...] On Behalf Of Robert > Pang > > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:59 PM > > To: col...@li... > > Subject: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > > > > Hi folks > > > > I have set up colinux 0.6.0 with Fedora Core 1 on Windows 2000 > workstation. > > I am using Wincap driver and FC1 is obtaining its IP address via DHCP to > the > > DHCP server in the LAN. The W2k has its static IP address. > > > > I have been thinking about somehow "sharing" the same static with FC1. I > > don't think real sharing is possible. Instead, I am thinking about doing a > > NAT translation in W2k to forward ports (e.g. ssh port 22) to FC1. I > suspect > > that it should be possible with Windows 2000 Internet Connection Sharing > > (ICS) but I had no luck enabling ICS in W2k. I read in the net that ICS > > won't be possible if there is already a DHCP server in the LAN. Does > anyone > > how about this? And assuming that I succeed in setting up ICS, how do I > set > > up NAT to forward port 22 from W2k to FC1? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Rob > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > coLinux-devel mailing list > > coL...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > coLinux-devel mailing list > > coL...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > |
From: Nathan C. <nat...@ya...> - 2004-04-21 01:18:12
|
Yes, but as Robert discovered, a static IP configuration is best for those who are going to use port forwarding. I have port 22 on my WinXP host, forwarded to 192.168.0.40 (the static IP address of the coLinux "box"). Since it is static, I am certain that it won't change, and I can SSH to port 22 on my Windows box from anywhere on the network and end up inside of the coLinux box. I love this app! --Nathan --- Richard Goodwin <ric...@ri...> wrote: > FYI on XP you can no longer modify the ICS DHCP > scope... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel R. Slater" <dan...@ya...> > To: "'Robert Pang'" <rob...@ho...>; > <col...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:46 PM > Subject: RE: [coLinux-devel] Re: NAT routing HOWTO - > solved partially? > > > > I believe that somewhere on your W2k box, you can > specify the range of > > addresses ICS serves up. You could try restricting > that range to 1 > address. > > Unfortunately it has been quite a while since I've > had to do this on W2k. > On > > my WXP box, my colinux machine gets the same ip > address every time it > boots, > > so this isn't an issue for me. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: col...@li... > > [mailto:col...@li...] > On Behalf Of Robert > Pang > > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:56 PM > > To: col...@li... > > Subject: [coLinux-devel] Re: NAT routing HOWTO - > solved partially? > > > > Thanks to Daniel and Chris. I gave it another try > with care and finally > > succeeded in setting up NAT with ICS on my W2k > workstation. What Daniel > said > > is true. My LAN is the "internet" and the Win-TAP > adaptor is the LAN. The > > presence of a real DHCP server in my "internet" > shouldn't interferce with > > ICS's DHCP as ICS should only serve DHCP to the > Win-TAP adaptor but not to > > the "internet". What required of me so that it > works now are that I need > to > > enable the "DHCP Client" service on my W2k host > and configure Win-TAP > > adaptor to obtain IP addr dynamically. I suppose > this note should be added > > to coLinux's Wiki network HOWTO section. > > > > I am also trying to set up port forwarding from > W2k to FC1. To forward the > > port, I need to specify the target host (IP addr) > but the addr that FC1 > gets > > keeps changing. Is there a way for FC1 to get a > stable IP addr over DHCP > or > > a way to point to FC1 in W2k's port-forwarding > config regardless of the > DHCP > > addr assigned to FC1? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Rob > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <ch...@to...> > > To: "Robert Pang" <rob...@ho...> > > Cc: <col...@li...> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:14 AM > > Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > > > > > > > for port forwarding in 2k. When you share the > connection on the sharing > > > tab of the connection properties (physical lan > connection) click the > > > settings button on the applications tab click > the add button. you should > > > probably forward both 22 tcp and 22udp to the > colinux host. you can even > > > translate the port so if you are running an shh > server on cygwin in > > > windows it could use 22 and a higher unused port > on windows could be > > > forwarded to 22 on colinux > > > > > > I hope this is right I have not tried it before. > Sometimes on windows I > > > think I am on the right track and then figure > out that the windows > > > designers had something totally different in > mind > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Daniel R. Slater" <dan...@ya...> > > To: <col...@li...> > > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:31 PM > > Subject: RE: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > > > > > > > I have this successfully working using Win XP. > What you need to do is > > share > > > your LAN connection with the Win-TAP adapter. > The DHCP server on your > LAN > > > shouldn't cause a problem because in this case, > your LAN is the > "internet" > > > while your Win-TAP adapter is the LAN. FC1 will > then get it's NAT'd IP > > > address from the W2k box. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: col...@li... > > > > [mailto:col...@li...] > On Behalf Of Robert > > Pang > > > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:59 PM > > > To: col...@li... > > > Subject: [coLinux-devel] NAT routing HOWTO? > > > > > > Hi folks > > > > > > I have set up colinux 0.6.0 with Fedora Core 1 > on Windows 2000 > > workstation. > > > I am using Wincap driver and FC1 is obtaining > its IP address via DHCP to > > the > > > DHCP server in the LAN. The W2k has its static > IP address. > > > > > > I have been thinking about somehow "sharing" the > same static with FC1. I > > > don't think real sharing is possible. Instead, I > am thinking about doing > a > > > NAT translation in W2k to forward ports (e.g. > ssh port 22) to FC1. I > > suspect > > > that it should be possible with Windows 2000 > Internet Connection Sharing > > > (ICS) but I had no luck enabling ICS in W2k. I > read in the net that ICS > > > won't be possible if there is already a DHCP > server in the LAN. Does > > anyone > > > how about this? And assuming that I succeed in > setting up ICS, how do I > > set > > > up NAT to forward port 22 from W2k to FC1? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux > Tutorials > > > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, > President and CEO of > > > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from > fundamentals to system > > > > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > > > _______________________________________________ > > > coLinux-devel mailing list > > > coL...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux > Tutorials > > > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, > President and CEO of > > > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from > fundamentals to system > > > > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > > > _______________________________________________ > > > coLinux-devel mailing list > > > coL...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢ http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash |
From: <ch...@to...> - 2004-04-20 11:14:32
|
for port forwarding in 2k. When you share the connection on the sharing tab of the connection properties (physical lan connection) click the settings button on the applications tab click the add button. you should probably forward both 22 tcp and 22udp to the colinux host. you can even translate the port so if you are running an shh server on cygwin in windows it could use 22 and a higher unused port on windows could be forwarded to 22 on colinux I hope this is right I have not tried it before. Sometimes on windows I think I am on the right track and then figure out that the windows designers had something totally different in mind chris > Hi folks > > I have set up colinux 0.6.0 with Fedora Core 1 on Windows 2000 > workstation. > I am using Wincap driver and FC1 is obtaining its IP address via DHCP to > the > DHCP server in the LAN. The W2k has its static IP address. > > I have been thinking about somehow "sharing" the same static with FC1. I > don't think real sharing is possible. Instead, I am thinking about doing a > NAT translation in W2k to forward ports (e.g. ssh port 22) to FC1. I > suspect > that it should be possible with Windows 2000 Internet Connection Sharing > (ICS) but I had no luck enabling ICS in W2k. I read in the net that ICS > won't be possible if there is already a DHCP server in the LAN. Does > anyone > how about this? And assuming that I succeed in setting up ICS, how do I > set > up NAT to forward port 22 from W2k to FC1? > > Thanks. > > Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > |