Menu
▾
▴
colinux-devel — Cooperative Linux development mailing list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(530) |
Mar
(266) |
Apr
(580) |
May
(360) |
Jun
(161) |
Jul
(185) |
Aug
(164) |
Sep
(123) |
Oct
(160) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(84) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(156) |
Feb
(95) |
Mar
(124) |
Apr
(81) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(179) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(57) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(59) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(65) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(54) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(103) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(29) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(61) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(53) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(60) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
|
From: Thomas F. <tf...@no...> - 2004-02-09 21:48:38
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dan, I build this with the native debian linux-gcc: gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 20040125 (prerelease) (Debian) I read that there are problem with 2.* gcc's, any trouble with 3.3.3? Thanks and regards, Thomas > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:57:01PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:10:49PM -0000, Thomas Fritzsche wrote: >> >> > I build colinux-20040208 with the first network-init patch from >> source. My >> > problem is that I receive the message: "Monitor terminated, reason 7". > > I take that back. Verify your compiler versions first. >> >> If you have some kernel debugging experience, I suggest you investigate >> from where one of these functions is called on your setup. > > -- > Dan Aloni > da...@gm... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAKAFanwJBIFTVIqwRAufWAKC2yVKwKluS83DcvJMY1PNuVFYFsgCgxZcj Htgdjnh3qBQJisahi4uupFE= =OmrM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 21:40:58
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:57:01PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:10:49PM -0000, Thomas Fritzsche wrote: > > > I build colinux-20040208 with the first network-init patch from source. My > > problem is that I receive the message: "Monitor terminated, reason 7". I take that back. Verify your compiler versions first. > > If you have some kernel debugging experience, I suggest you investigate > from where one of these functions is called on your setup. -- Dan Aloni da...@gm... |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 21:32:56
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:19:33PM +1000, Ian Latter wrote: > Hello Dan, > > I've included all of the details I can think to .. I've also attached > the kernel that this combination produced. Let me know if you > need something/anything else. You are using gcc 3.2. I use gcc 3.3 to compile all code for coLinux, including vmlinux and linux.sys. There could be a binary incompatibility between the version of your gcc (3.2) and the gcc that linux.sys was compiled against (3.3). My current compilers versions: [23:22 pts/10,callisto ~]% gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.3/specs Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-objc-gc i486-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3.3 20040125 (prerelease) (Debian) [23:24 pts/10,callisto ~]% i686-pc-cygwin-gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/local/w32build/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.2/specs Configured with: ./configure --target=i686-pc-cygwin --prefix=/usr/local/w32build --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: single gcc version 3.3.2 -- Dan Aloni da...@gm... |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 21:01:01
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:10:54PM +0100, R?gis NEBOR wrote: > Ok , I thought the TAP implementation was different from the OpenVPN one. > Is it ? It is the TAP driver taken from OpenVPN as is. > I'll upload a script named rcolinux.nsi which keep files the same. Tell me > where i can integrate in in your code tree for instant deployment, and I'll > change it. Since it's Windows-dependent, it think it would be good to put it as the main/src/colinux/os/winnt/setup directory. Okay? -- Dan Aloni da...@gm... |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 20:57:19
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:10:49PM -0000, Thomas Fritzsche wrote:
> I build colinux-20040208 with the first network-init patch from source. My
> problem is that I receive the message: "Monitor terminated, reason 7".
The value originates from this enum:
typedef enum {
CO_TERMINATE_END=0,
CO_TERMINATE_REBOOT,
CO_TERMINATE_POWEROFF,
CO_TERMINATE_PANIC,
CO_TERMINATE_HALT,
CO_TERMINATE_FORCED_OFF,
CO_TERMINATE_FORCED_END,
CO_TERMINATE_INVALID_OPERATION,
} co_termination_reason_t;
Which suggests CO_TERMINATE_INVALID_OPERATION.
This termination code is omitted from within the Linux kernel in 2
locations:
static inline void * ioremap (unsigned long offset, unsigned long size)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_COOPERATIVE
+ co_debug("ioremap %x:%d\n", offset, size);
+ co_terminate(CO_TERMINATE_INVALID_OPERATION);
+#endif
return __ioremap(offset, size, 0);
}
static inline void * ioremap_nocache (unsigned long offset, unsigned
long size)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_COOPERATIVE
+ co_debug("ioremap %x:%d\n", offset, size);
+ co_terminate(CO_TERMINATE_INVALID_OPERATION);
+#endif
return __ioremap(offset, size, _PAGE_PCD);
}
If you have some kernel debugging experience, I suggest you investigate
from where one of these functions is called on your setup.
--
Dan Aloni
da...@gm...
|
|
From: Régis N. <rn...@ho...> - 2004-02-09 17:22:24
|
Ok , I thought the TAP implementation was different from the OpenVPN one. Is it ? I'll upload a script named rcolinux.nsi which keep files the same. Tell me where i can integrate in in your code tree for instant deployment, and I'll change it. Regis >From: Dan Aloni <da...@gm...> >To: rn...@ho... >CC: col...@li... >Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] Updated script and installer ... >Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:30:06 +0200 > >On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:50:37AM +0100, R?gis NEBOR wrote: > > To avoid conflict with OpenVPN installation and uninstallation , I also > > renamed the driver with the co prefix. > >First, thanks for working on this installer script, we will use it >someday. > >AFAIK you can install the TAP driver twice or more. In OpenVPN, you can >specify the name of the TAP network interface that you would like to >use. Currently in coLinux, colinux-net-daemon automatically picks up a >TAP interface to use - it's not good and needs to be changed. I prefer >it would be configurable just like in OpenVPN. > >So, I don't see any reason why you need to add that prefix. > >-- >Dan Aloni >da...@gm... > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 >Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration >See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. >http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn >_______________________________________________ >coLinux-devel mailing list >coL...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |
|
From: Thomas F. <tf...@no...> - 2004-02-09 17:06:03
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello coLinux-hackers, I build colinux-20040208 with the first network-init patch from source. My problem is that I receive the message: "Monitor terminated, reason 7". In detail: after starting the daemon the console pops up and I see the begin of the kernel boot: ....BogoMIPS....CPU:.... Linux NET4.0... Initializing RT netlink socket.. Starting kswapd... Journalled Block Device driver loaded. The message with the "Block Device" is the last in the console. The console stays open and I see the message that the TAP-WIN network was disconnected (message in systemtray). In the MS-Dos window I see Monitor terminated, reason 7 and other messages that the Monitor is shutting down etc. Any Hints? Thanks and regards, Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAJ78ZnwJBIFTVIqwRAkaXAKCAXddyYUhy4EPBtrZbRF+/aS8YCACgyBhE /DkzYAYIyEsGzGvno6Gon3w= =9YT5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 15:30:13
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:50:37AM +0100, R?gis NEBOR wrote: > To avoid conflict with OpenVPN installation and uninstallation , I also > renamed the driver with the co prefix. First, thanks for working on this installer script, we will use it someday. AFAIK you can install the TAP driver twice or more. In OpenVPN, you can specify the name of the TAP network interface that you would like to use. Currently in coLinux, colinux-net-daemon automatically picks up a TAP interface to use - it's not good and needs to be changed. I prefer it would be configurable just like in OpenVPN. So, I don't see any reason why you need to add that prefix. -- Dan Aloni da...@gm... |
|
From: Andrei D. <adr...@ia...> - 2004-02-09 13:29:18
|
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:03:59PM +0200, Andrei DRAGOMIR wrote: > > My workstation is configured like this: static ip (192.168.0.x), static dns > > (192.168.0.1), static gateway(192.168.0.1). I have installed the TAP driver, > > bridged the connections, but in cL, ping and/or any other network operations > > doesn't work. When i look at the connection details in the taskbar i have > > only sent packets, received packets is zero. > > Do you have a residential gateway of some sort on your network at 192.168.0.1? > Or is your Windows host directly connected to another non-192.168.0.x > network? > By workstation, I assume you mean your coLinux image. That appears to be > configured correctly if the above assumption is correct. No, by workstation I mean the normal Windows configuration (sorry). > > If your Windows host is supposed to be 192.168.0.1, you probably need to turn > off bridging and turn on Internet Connection Sharing as well as > set a valid DNS server (unless you plan on running a recursive DNS > server on your Windows host itself). > Yes, the gateway is at 192.168.0.1, and my workstation (Windows) is 192.168.0.199 (for example). In any case, my IP can't be 192.168.0.1. I have solved the problem in a way (I have noticed that these problems started to happen after i installed the 20040208 colinux binaries): fallback to the old 20040131 binaries. That's all, didn't replace the TAP driver, no nothing.My current config is the one I read about in the mailing list: 2 bridged connections. |
|
From: Ian C. B. <ia...@bl...> - 2004-02-09 13:18:24
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:03:59PM +0200, Andrei DRAGOMIR wrote: > My workstation is configured like this: static ip (192.168.0.x), static dns > (192.168.0.1), static gateway(192.168.0.1). I have installed the TAP driver, > bridged the connections, but in cL, ping and/or any other network operations > doesn't work. When i look at the connection details in the taskbar i have > only sent packets, received packets is zero. Do you have a residential gateway of some sort on your network at 192.168.0.1? Or is your Windows host directly connected to another non-192.168.0.x network? By workstation, I assume you mean your coLinux image. That appears to be configured correctly if the above assumption is correct. If your Windows host is supposed to be 192.168.0.1, you probably need to turn off bridging and turn on Internet Connection Sharing as well as set a valid DNS server (unless you plan on running a recursive DNS server on your Windows host itself). We really need more information to deduce what your problem might be. > Can anyone tell me how to configure cL so that i can access the network ? > Thanks in advance, Andrei We might want to write up an FAQ on this soon. It appears this will be a common question. - Ian C. Blenke <ia...@bl...> |
|
From: Andrei D. <adr...@ia...> - 2004-02-09 13:04:48
|
My workstation is configured like this: static ip (192.168.0.x), static dns (192.168.0.1), static gateway(192.168.0.1). I have installed the TAP driver, bridged the connections, but in cL, ping and/or any other network operations doesn't work. When i look at the connection details in the taskbar i have only sent packets, received packets is zero. My netstat -rn output is like this Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 Can anyone tell me how to configure cL so that i can access the network ? Thanks in advance, Andrei |
|
From: andre <avb...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 11:17:27
|
On Monday 09 February 2004 06:56, Dan Aloni wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:46:47AM +0100, R?gis NEBOR wrote: > > Hi > > > > I just got it to work on a real debian 3.0 installation ( which was in my > > /dev/hda2 ) > > (system = XP Home edition) > > Here is the config file: > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <colinux> > > <block_device index="0" path="\Device\HarddiskVolume2" enabled="true"> > > </block_device> > > Yes, using raw devices is possible. Can you also mount the C: disk in such a way or do you get a conflict that way |
|
From: andre <avb...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 11:15:19
|
On Monday 09 February 2004 10:26, Ian Latter wrote: > Ok, so you want to: > > 1. Boot Linux from CDROM > 2. To have Linux act as an installer > 3. To install Linux on the local hard disk > > Presumably, from this list, you want step 3 to really be an installer > for a coLinux virtual machine, not a regular Linux install? > If you can use a raw device (which you can) you could also install it with a real Linux kernel. |
|
From: Régis N. <rn...@ho...> - 2004-02-09 08:50:43
|
To avoid conflict with OpenVPN installation and uninstallation , I also renamed the driver with the co prefix. Regis _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |
|
From: Régis N. <rn...@ho...> - 2004-02-09 08:24:57
|
You're right , that's not what I want. What I want is a way to install a distro within colinux, the distro installation disc in my cdrom. In other words: how to launch the image of a bootable cdrom, and install it using the deamon ? I guess the method would work with isos too. Regis >From: "Ian Latter" <Ian...@mq...> >Reply-To: "Ian Latter" <Ian...@mq...> >To: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> >CC: <col...@li...> >Subject: Re:[coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:26:32 +1000 > > >Ok, so you want to: > > 1. Boot Linux from CDROM > 2. To have Linux act as an installer > 3. To install Linux on the local hard disk > > Presumably, from this list, you want step 3 to really be an installer >for a coLinux virtual machine, not a regular Linux install? > > If you're trying to make the installer simple, wouldn't you just want >an autorun to go with your exe installer? (as opposed to booting to >Linux and playing from there?). > > The stuff you want for booting Linux is "mkisofs" and "isolinux" >(from Peter Alvin). I can give over details .. but I'm still not convinced >that this is what you want. > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> > >To: <Ian...@mq...> > >Subject: Re:[coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? > >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 07:14:52 +0100 > > > > Yeah I want to be able to make a linux install from let's say a debian >cd. > > > > > > >From: "Ian Latter" <Ian...@mq...> > > >Reply-To: "Ian Latter" <Ian...@mq...> > > >To: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> > > >CC: col...@li... > > >Subject: Re:[coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? > > >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:06:42 +1000 > > > > > > > > >Hello, > > > > > > I can give you all of the config info you need to boot Linux from > > >a CDROM, but this wouldn't be what you're after, would it? What > > >do you really want to do? Boot from CD, or just install coLinux > > >from CD under Windows? > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> > > > >To: <col...@li...> > > > >Subject: [coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? > > > >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:21:26 +0100 > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Is there a way to boot from a cd or map it , then make an >installation ? > > > > > > > > I tried to play with bootparams and fake a : > > > > root=/dev/ram ro initrd=idepci.bin ramdisk_size=16384 disksize=1.44 > > > > flavor=idepci > > > > > > > > but it's not working > > > > > > > > Can one of you help here ? > > > > > > > > Regis > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > > > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > > > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > > > > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > coLinux-devel mailing list > > > > coL...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >Ian Latter > > >Internet and Networking Security Officer > > >Macquarie University > > > > > > Meet me at the Australian Unix and open systems > > > User Group (AUUG) Security Symposium; 2004 > > > http://www.auug.org.au/events/2004/security/ > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > > >The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > >Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > >See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > > >http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > >_______________________________________________ > > >coLinux-devel mailing list > > >coL...@li... > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > > > > >-- >Ian Latter >Internet and Networking Security Officer >Macquarie University > > Meet me at the Australian Unix and open systems > User Group (AUUG) Security Symposium; 2004 > http://www.auug.org.au/events/2004/security/ > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 >Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration >See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. >http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn >_______________________________________________ >coLinux-devel mailing list >coL...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |
|
From: Ian L. <Ian...@mq...> - 2004-02-09 08:13:28
|
Ok, so you want to: 1. Boot Linux from CDROM 2. To have Linux act as an installer 3. To install Linux on the local hard disk Presumably, from this list, you want step 3 to really be an installer for a coLinux virtual machine, not a regular Linux install? If you're trying to make the installer simple, wouldn't you just want an autorun to go with your exe installer? (as opposed to booting to Linux and playing from there?). The stuff you want for booting Linux is "mkisofs" and "isolinux" (from Peter Alvin). I can give over details .. but I'm still not convinced that this is what you want. ----- Original Message ----- >From: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> >To: <Ian...@mq...> >Subject: Re:[coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 07:14:52 +0100 > > Yeah I want to be able to make a linux install from let's say a debian cd. > > > >From: "Ian Latter" <Ian...@mq...> > >Reply-To: "Ian Latter" <Ian...@mq...> > >To: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> > >CC: col...@li... > >Subject: Re:[coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? > >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:06:42 +1000 > > > > > >Hello, > > > > I can give you all of the config info you need to boot Linux from > >a CDROM, but this wouldn't be what you're after, would it? What > >do you really want to do? Boot from CD, or just install coLinux > >from CD under Windows? > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> > > >To: <col...@li...> > > >Subject: [coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? > > >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:21:26 +0100 > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Is there a way to boot from a cd or map it , then make an installation ? > > > > > > I tried to play with bootparams and fake a : > > > root=/dev/ram ro initrd=idepci.bin ramdisk_size=16384 disksize=1.44 > > > flavor=idepci > > > > > > but it's not working > > > > > > Can one of you help here ? > > > > > > Regis > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > > > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > > _______________________________________________ > > > coLinux-devel mailing list > > > coL...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > > > > >-- > >Ian Latter > >Internet and Networking Security Officer > >Macquarie University > > > > Meet me at the Australian Unix and open systems > > User Group (AUUG) Security Symposium; 2004 > > http://www.auug.org.au/events/2004/security/ > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > >Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > >See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > >http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > >_______________________________________________ > >coLinux-devel mailing list > >coL...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > _________________________________________________________________ > Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > -- Ian Latter Internet and Networking Security Officer Macquarie University Meet me at the Australian Unix and open systems User Group (AUUG) Security Symposium; 2004 http://www.auug.org.au/events/2004/security/ |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 06:20:00
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:59:22PM +1000, Ian Latter wrote: > The environment is the binary release of 20040208 along with > the supplied kernel (good boot) and the locally built kernel using > the 20040208 .config and kernel patch + the network interrupt > fix/patch (of http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php? > thread_id=3864167&forum_id=37408 fame). Both used the same > boot options (I copied the over the vmlinux file for each version). > The install directory is currently c:misc, the root filesystem is > the coLinux supplied Debian 1Gig. The build process patches > cleanly - the binaries a slightly different sizes. This is helpful, Please tell me the exact versions of all the tools you use to build the coLinux binaries. -- Dan Aloni da...@gm... |
|
From: Régis N. <rn...@ho...> - 2004-02-09 06:15:01
|
Yeah I want to be able to make a linux install from let's say a debian cd. >From: "Ian Latter" <Ian...@mq...> >Reply-To: "Ian Latter" <Ian...@mq...> >To: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> >CC: col...@li... >Subject: Re:[coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:06:42 +1000 > > >Hello, > > I can give you all of the config info you need to boot Linux from >a CDROM, but this wouldn't be what you're after, would it? What >do you really want to do? Boot from CD, or just install coLinux >from CD under Windows? > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> > >To: <col...@li...> > >Subject: [coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? > >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:21:26 +0100 > > > > Hi > > > > Is there a way to boot from a cd or map it , then make an installation ? > > > > I tried to play with bootparams and fake a : > > root=/dev/ram ro initrd=idepci.bin ramdisk_size=16384 disksize=1.44 > > flavor=idepci > > > > but it's not working > > > > Can one of you help here ? > > > > Regis > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > _______________________________________________ > > coLinux-devel mailing list > > coL...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > > > >-- >Ian Latter >Internet and Networking Security Officer >Macquarie University > > Meet me at the Australian Unix and open systems > User Group (AUUG) Security Symposium; 2004 > http://www.auug.org.au/events/2004/security/ > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 >Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration >See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. >http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn >_______________________________________________ >coLinux-devel mailing list >coL...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 06:09:28
|
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 07:42:21PM -0800, Ballard Jonathan wrote: > I added an #include to os/winnt/kernel/lowlevel/alloc.c. There was no > specific definition of PAGE_SIZE except in asm/page.h. It could have > conflicted with the PAGE_SIZE from the DDK, and I think the linux one is > preferred: > > #include <asm/page.h> Generally, I prefer not mixing inclusion of OS-dependent headers and Linux headers, but we'll add this include for now. -- Dan Aloni da...@gm... |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 06:03:53
|
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 04:55:07PM -0800, Ballard Jonathan wrote: > I was curious about the intention of the packed data structures. There are > many of them. I wondered if they are required to be packed or if they just > save space being packed. Packed structures are great at size but at the > cost of speed being non-aligned. If there is no requirement for them to be > packed, then would an option that optimizes for speed be pratical? We are using two different compilers to access the data, packing of 1 prevents problems regarding field offsets. > About the "long long," it is unfortunate that such C syntax is not > standardized. I imagine it is one of the reasons why Intel and other > manufacturers hold back their 64 bit processors. That is one of the reasons > why a header file is usually made to standardized the syntax at the project > level. Most variables within functions do not need a project level syntax, > yet it is helpful. The data structures, however, need a standard. An > example: > > In the project level header: > > #define coLinuxNatural8bit unsigned char > #define coLinuxNatural16bit unsigned short > #define coLinuxNatural32bit unsigned long > #define coLinuxNatural64bit unsigned long long When coLinux gets ported to other architectures it may need what you mention above, but as long as the two compilers we are using are of two compatible GNU gcc versions, there shouldn't be any problem with C types. -- Dan Aloni da...@gm... |
|
From: Dan A. <da...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 05:56:20
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:46:47AM +0100, R?gis NEBOR wrote: > Hi > > I just got it to work on a real debian 3.0 installation ( which was in my > /dev/hda2 ) > (system = XP Home edition) > Here is the config file: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <colinux> > <block_device index="0" path="\Device\HarddiskVolume2" enabled="true"> > </block_device> Yes, using raw devices is possible. > <block_device index="1" path="\DosDevices\D:" enabled="true"> > </block_device> > <bootparams>root=/dev/cobd0</bootparams> > <image path="vmlinux"></image> > </colinux> > > As you can see I also tried to mount my CD drive ( D: ) but iso9660 was not > supported on the minimal install. I'll check, perhaps it is compiled as a kernel module. > Feature request: add a node or attrib for device mapping : > I had to modify my fstab line where /dev/hda2 / to /dev/codb0 / > how about a node like this: <block_device map="/dev/hda2/" ...> ? > This way the same system can run for real (dual boot) or emulated in > windows !! > > No Network still. This got fixed after the 0.5.3-pre1 release. > Would you mind joining irc.freenode.org #colinux ? Yes, although I've already opened it up in irc.oftc.net, where #kernelnewbies is hosted. -- Dan Aloni da...@gm... |
|
From: Ian L. <Ian...@mq...> - 2004-02-09 05:54:35
|
Hello, You've filled the gap! devcon.exe .. thank you very much ... good stuff. ----- Original Message ----- >From: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> >To: <col...@li...> >Subject: [coLinux-devel] Colinux Installer & script >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:04:48 +0100 > > Hi > > I made one: 1,17 Mb , nsis lzma compression (best) , no image, the files are > from the last sourceforge drop, devcon.exe is from openvpn and is used to > install/remove the network service. > > http://www.ultrabigmailbox.com/colinux.nsi > http://www.ultrabigmailbox.com/colinux.exe for tests (upload it in > sourceforge maybe , it won't last) > > NOTE: I named prefixed TAP stuff with CO so that people using OpenVpn can > run both TAP-WIN32 > and COTAP-WIN32 > > Keep up the good work guys > > Regis > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > -- Ian Latter Internet and Networking Security Officer Macquarie University Meet me at the Australian Unix and open systems User Group (AUUG) Security Symposium; 2004 http://www.auug.org.au/events/2004/security/ |
|
From: Ian L. <Ian...@mq...> - 2004-02-09 05:52:46
|
Hello, I can give you all of the config info you need to boot Linux from a CDROM, but this wouldn't be what you're after, would it? What do you really want to do? Boot from CD, or just install coLinux from CD under Windows? ----- Original Message ----- >From: "Rgis NEBOR" <rn...@ho...> >To: <col...@li...> >Subject: [coLinux-devel] How can we CD boot ? >Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:21:26 +0100 > > Hi > > Is there a way to boot from a cd or map it , then make an installation ? > > I tried to play with bootparams and fake a : > root=/dev/ram ro initrd=idepci.bin ramdisk_size=16384 disksize=1.44 > flavor=idepci > > but it's not working > > Can one of you help here ? > > Regis > > _________________________________________________________________ > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > -- Ian Latter Internet and Networking Security Officer Macquarie University Meet me at the Australian Unix and open systems User Group (AUUG) Security Symposium; 2004 http://www.auug.org.au/events/2004/security/ |
|
From: Régis N. <rn...@ho...> - 2004-02-09 05:21:32
|
Hi Is there a way to boot from a cd or map it , then make an installation ? I tried to play with bootparams and fake a : root=/dev/ram ro initrd=idepci.bin ramdisk_size=16384 disksize=1.44 flavor=idepci but it's not working Can one of you help here ? Regis _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |
|
From: Ballard J. <sac...@ho...> - 2004-02-09 04:13:40
|
From the documentation, your right. They released the compiler "Academic"
at the same time as C99. I know that the schools have not adopted the C99
standard. That would mean new books and higher costs for the students.
Some of that stuff in C99 is not needed.
I'm still going to be stubborn about some of the C habits that I have known
for a long long time.
Where is the advantage between:
struct { int a ; char b[0] ; }
and
struct { int a ; char *b ; }
I can think of one for C++.
Thanks for the article.
Jonathan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Hoyle" <tm...@no...>
To: "Ballard Jonathan" <sac...@ho...>
Cc: "Dan Aloni" <da...@gm...>; "coLinux Development"
<col...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] packed structures, long long
> Ballard Jonathan wrote:
>
> > About the "long long," it is unfortunate that such C syntax is not
> > standardized. I imagine it is one of the reasons why Intel and other
>
> It is... It's in the C99 standard (ratified in 1999, funnily enough).
>
> http://home.tiscalinet.ch/t_wolf/tw/c/c9x_changes.html
>
> What compiler are you using that doesn't support this?
>
> Tony
>
>
|
81 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
