Re: [Codestriker-user] 1.9.2 vs. 1.9.1 issues -- response time and colorization

[David C. <dcc...@gm...>]

I believe I have solved both problems.  Since I had two installations
on the same machine, I gave the 1.9.2 install a different path in
httpd.conf, so that I could still access both of them. Therefore, I
needed to define codestriker_css in the config file.  Since I did not,
I was getting a header that did not reference the .css file or the .js
files correctly.

No .css explains the colorization.  I suspect the latency problems
were related to this somehow.  It also explains why there were a few
other anomalies, such as the fact that the 'help' link did not take me
to help.

I may be ready to upgrade finally!!

On 2/1/07, David & Andriani Carson <car...@ve...> wrote:
> We have a 1.9.1 deployed for general use on our CVS server. I
> installed 1.9.2 recently on the same server. It also references the
> same database.
>
> The 1.9.2 installation is currently only for my testing purposes, not
> generally available. I am ready to switch over, except for two
> issues.
>
> 1. The response time from the 1.9.2 installation is awful.
>
> Does anyone know why there should be such a difference? Is there
> anything I can do to determine the cause of the latency?
>
> 2. Also, the 1.9.2 installation is not colorizing the pages, including
> the topic list (no alternate dark/light), the diff (no colors for
> removed/changed/added), etc. I have been over the config files and
> cannot see any differences besides new comments added in 1.9.2.
>